پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 8 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 421 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,526 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,369,470 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,480,588 |
بررسی وضعیت مدیریت پسماند در شهرک صنعتی چرمشهر و سالاریه با دیدگاه توسعه پایدار TBL و تحلیل سلسله مرتبی | ||
| نشریه مهندسی عمران امیرکبیر | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 46، شماره 1، شهریور 1393، صفحه 77-90 اصل مقاله (1.13 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22060/ceej.2014.331 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فریدون غضبان* 1؛ حسین وحیدی2؛ سید مسعود طایفه3؛ علی احمد زاده4؛ سید وحید موسوی4 | ||
| 1استاد، دانشکده - مهندسی محیط زیست، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده مهندسی محیط زیست، پژوهشکده توسعه و تکنولوژی دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 3دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده مهندسی محیط زیست، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 4دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد - HSE ، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه در کشور های صنعتی و درحال توسعه، صنایع مختلف با سرعت زیادی رو به گسترش هستند. جمع آوری صنایع در یک محل مزایایی مانند امکان مدیریت بهتر، ایجاد زیر ساخت های لازم با هزینه کمتر، کنترل آلودگی و ایجاد رقابت بیشتر و همچنین معایبی مانند تولید زباله متفاوت بسته به نوع صنایع با حجم بالا می شود. بدین منظور، کمیت و کیفیت زباله های شهرک صنعتی چرمشهر و سالاریه با بیش از 200 کارخانه فعال و تولید سالانه حدود 21 هزار تن پسماند جامد، مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت و سیستم فعلی مدیریت پسماند شهرک واکاوی گردید. در ادامه، با بکارگیری تکنیک‌های تصمیم گیری چند معیاره روش بهینه دفع نهایی پسماند برای شهرک صنعتی شناسایی شد.بدین منظور، تکنیک AHP به همراه مفهوم توسعه پایدار TBL مورد استفاده قرار گرفت و همچنین تحلیل حساسیت برای تعیین میزان اثرگذاری هریک از معیارها در انتخاب گزینه بهینه دفع نهایی انجام گرفت. گزینه بازیافت با وزن 0.325 به عنوان بهترین گزینه دفع و گزینه زباله سوز با وزن 0.243 دومین ارجحیت و همچنین گزینه های کمپوست و دفن در زمین به ترتیب با وزن های 0.238 و0.194 به عنوان گزینه های بعدی انتخاب شده اند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مدیریت پسماند؛ شهرک صنعتی؛ تحلیل سلسله مراتبی؛ توسعه پایدار؛ TBL | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Assessing the solid waste management systems in the industrial state of Charmshahr & Salariyeh by using AHP & TBL | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fereydoun Ghazban1؛ Hossein Vahidi2؛ Seyed Masoud tayefeh3؛ Ali Ahmadzadeh4؛ Seyed Vahid Mosavi4 | ||
| 1Professor, Department of Environmental Engineering, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2PhD. Student, Department for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR) Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3M.Sc. Student, Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Tehran, Aras International Campus, Iran | ||
| 4M.Sc. Student, Department of Research & Technology, Pars Special Economic Energy Zone, NIOC, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Nowadays, in developing and under developing countries industries are developed rapidly. Ghathering various industries in one place has significant advantages such as better management, establishing essential foundations with lower costs, controlling the environmental pollutions and creating more competitions. On the other hand, the disadvantaged are generating various wastes in the high volumes. Therefore, the quantity and the quality of the Charmshahr & Salariyeh industrial state are assessed. This state has more than 200 active factories which lead to generate more than 21 thousand tons per year. Hence, AHP technique with the application of TBL method is conducted to choose the most proper solid waste management system for the state. Moreover, the sensitive analysis is conducted too. At end, recycling with the final weight of 0,325 is selected as the most proper scenario and incineration stands at the second place with the weight of 0.243. However, composting and landfilling are chosen as the next strategies with the weights of 0.238 and 0.194, respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Solid waste Management, Industrial state, Sustainable assessment, TBL, AHP | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1]عابدی زاده، فریماه، منوری، سید مسعود، بررسی مدیریت پسماندها در شهر صنعتی رشت، علوم محیوی سال چهارم، - . شماره چهارم ، 118- 101 ، تابستان1386 [2]en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_park. [3]Ramanathan, R. ,“A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment”, Journal of Environmental Management, 63(1): pp. 27-35, 2001. [4]Beccali, M., M. Cellura, and M. Mistretta, “Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology”, Renewable Energy, 28(13): pp. 2063-2087, 2003. [5]Wu, M.C. and T.Y. Chen ,“The ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach based on Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10): pp. 12318-12327, 2011. [6]Norese, M.F. ,“ELECTRE III as a support for participatory decision-making on the localisation of waste-treatment plants”, Land Use Policy, 23(1): pp. 76-85, 2006. [7] Vetschera, R. and A.T. De Almeida ,“A PROMETHEE-based approach to portfolio selection problems”, Computers and Operations Research, 39(5): pp. 1010-1020, 2012. [8]Brans, J.P., P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal, “How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method”, European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2): pp. 228-238, 1986. [9]Chan, E.H.W., H.C.H. Suen, and C.K.L. Chan ,“MAUT-based dispute resolution selection model prototype for international construction projects”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(5): pp. 444-451, 2006. [10]Prato, T. ,“Multiple-attribute evaluation of ecosystem management for the Missouri River system”, Ecological Economics, 45(2): pp. 297-309, 2003. [11]Wang, M., S.J. Lin, and Y.C. Lo. ,“The comparison between MAUT and PROMETHEE”, 2010. [12]Karamouz, M., et al. ,“Developing a master plan for hospital solid waste management: A case study” , Waste Management, 27(5): pp. 626-638, 2007. [13]Pires, A., N.-B. Chang, and G. Martinho, “An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setúbal Peninsula”, Portugal. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 56(1): pp. 7-21, 2011. [14]Gumus, A.T. ,“Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology”, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2, Part 2): pp. 4067-4074, 2009. [15]Önüt, S. and S. Soner ,“Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment”, Waste Management, 28(9): pp. 1552-1559, 2008. [16]M. Kemal, K., Discussion of ,“Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: A case study in the Lake Beysehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey)”, Waste Management, 30, 11, 2010, 2037–2046. Waste Management, 31(6): pp. 1250-1251, 2011. [17]Şener, Ş., E. Sener, and R. Karagüzel, “Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: A case study in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin”, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 173(1-4): pp. 533-554, 2011. [18]Khorshiddoust, A.M. and Z. Adeli ,“The application of AHP method for optimum solid waste landfill site selection: A case study of Bo nab city in East Azerbaijan Province”, Iran. Journal of Environmental Studies, 35(50): pp. 27-32, 2009. [19]Wang, G.Q., et al. ,“Optimizing the collection and transportation of municipal solid wastes based on AHP”, Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 28(9): pp. 838-842, 2008. [20]Li, R.Z., J.Q. Wang, and J.Z. Qian, “Delphi-AHP method for allocation of waste loads in a region”, Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 37(1): pp. 84-88, 2005. [21]Klang ,A., Vikman, P., Brattebø, H., “Sustainable management of demolition waste an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects, Resources”, Conservation and Recycling, pp. 38 317/334, 2003. [22]S. H¨ uffer, T. Taeger ,“Sustainable leather manufacturing a topic with growing importance”, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 99 (10) pp. 423–428, 2004. [23]WBCSD and United Nations Environment Programme. Cleaner Production and Eco-efficiency*/ Complementary Approaches to Sustainable Development. WBCSD: Geneva;1998. [24] United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Agenda 21*/An Action Plan for the Next Century. United Nations. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 1992. [25] a, Y.-M.W., Y.L. b, and Z. Hua, On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research (186): pp. 735-747, 2008. [26]Basak Sener, M. Lutfi Suzen, and V. Doyura, Landfill site selection by using geographic information system. Environ Geol ( 49): pp. 376-388, 2006. [27]Al-Harbi, K.M.A.-S. ,“Application of the AHP in project management”, International Journal of Project Management, (19 ): pp. 19- 27, 2001. [28]saaty, t.l., an analytical hierarchy process. New York: MacGrave- Hill, 1980. [29]Amiri, M.P. ,“Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods”, xpert Systems with Applications (37): pp. 6218–6224, 2010. [30]Duen-Ren Liua and Y.-Y. Shih, “Integrating AHP and data mining for product recommendation based on customer lifetime value”, Information & Management (42): pp. 387-400, 2005. [31]Semih Onut and S. Soner ,“Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment”, Waste Management (28): pp. 1552-1559, 2008. [32]Shams Fallah, F., Vahidi, H., Pazoki, M., Akhavan limodehi, F., Aslemand, A., Samiee-Zafarghandi, R., “Investigation of Solid Waste Disposal Alternatives in Lavan Island Using Life Cycle Assessment Approach”, International journal of Environmental research, Int. J. Environ. Res., 7(1) pp. 155-164, Winter, 2013. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,748 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 4,349 |
||
