آمار

تعداد نشریات8
تعداد شماره‌ها421
تعداد مقالات5,523
تعداد مشاهده مقاله6,343,092
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,467,769
Dashti, Pooria, Banar, Rasoul, Ramezanianpour, AmirMohammad, Zolfagharnasab, Arash, ramezanian pour, ali akbar, Nikravan, Morteza. (1401). Evaluation of Sustainability Performance of Cementitious Mortars Containing Silica Fume. نشریه مهندسی عمران امیرکبیر, 6(2), 175-190. doi: 10.22060/ajce.2022.21321.5801
Pooria Dashti; Rasoul Banar; AmirMohammad Ramezanianpour; Arash Zolfagharnasab; ali akbar ramezanian pour; Morteza Nikravan. "Evaluation of Sustainability Performance of Cementitious Mortars Containing Silica Fume". نشریه مهندسی عمران امیرکبیر, 6, 2, 1401, 175-190. doi: 10.22060/ajce.2022.21321.5801
Dashti, Pooria, Banar, Rasoul, Ramezanianpour, AmirMohammad, Zolfagharnasab, Arash, ramezanian pour, ali akbar, Nikravan, Morteza. (1401). 'Evaluation of Sustainability Performance of Cementitious Mortars Containing Silica Fume', نشریه مهندسی عمران امیرکبیر, 6(2), pp. 175-190. doi: 10.22060/ajce.2022.21321.5801
Dashti, Pooria, Banar, Rasoul, Ramezanianpour, AmirMohammad, Zolfagharnasab, Arash, ramezanian pour, ali akbar, Nikravan, Morteza. Evaluation of Sustainability Performance of Cementitious Mortars Containing Silica Fume. نشریه مهندسی عمران امیرکبیر, 1401; 6(2): 175-190. doi: 10.22060/ajce.2022.21321.5801

Evaluation of Sustainability Performance of Cementitious Mortars Containing Silica Fume

AUT Journal of Civil Engineering
دوره 6، شماره 2، شهریور 2022، صفحه 175-190    اصل مقاله (1.23 M)
نوع مقاله: Research Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22060/ajce.2022.21321.5801
نویسندگان
Pooria Dashti1؛ Rasoul Banar1؛ AmirMohammad Ramezanianpour2؛ Arash Zolfagharnasab1؛ ali akbar ramezanian pour1؛ Morteza Nikravan* 3
1Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
2School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3Building Materials and Construction Chemistry, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
چکیده
Because of the growing importance of sustainability in the global market, as well as the negative environmental consequences of cement manufacturing, partial replacement of Portland cement (PC) with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as silica fume (SF) has become increasingly popular. The purpose of this study was to build a framework for sustainable practices based on eighteen sustainability indicators, which included technical, economic, and environmental factors. Cementitious matrixes were generated by replacing PC with SF at different percentages of the mass of the matrix: 0, 5, 6.5, 7.5, 8.5, and 10%. Several laboratory experiments were carried out to obtain an accurate evaluation, including the measurement of setting times, compressive strength, capillary water absorption, and surface electrical resistivity on mortar specimens, which were used as technical indicators. The environmental implications of products were also evaluated using a life cycle approach, and sensitivity analysis was performed to develop a robust sustainability assessment model for SF substitution. In addition, According to the findings, SF has the potential to raise the sustainability score by at least 36.4% and as much as 118.2%. When compared to all of the other combinations evaluated, the specimen containing 8.5% SF achieved the greatest sustainability score and was the most sustainable mixture. The concept and technique used in this study can be applied to other SCMs of a similar nature.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Silica fume (SF)؛ Sustainability؛ Optimum replacement level؛ Life cycle assessment (LCA)؛ Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs)
مراجع
  1. Bhanja, B. Sengupta, Modified water–cement ratio law for silica fume concretes, Cement and Concrete Research, 33(3) (2003) 447-450.
  2. D. Thomas, M. Shehata, S. Shashiprakash, D. Hopkins, K. Cail, Use of ternary cementitious systems containing silica fume and fly ash in concrete, Cement and concrete research, 29(8) (1999) 1207-1214.
  3. A. Abd Elaty, M.F. Ghazy, Performance of Portland cement mixes containing silica fume and mixed with lime-water, HBRC Journal, 10(3) (2014) 247-257.
  4. Yan, W. Sun, H. Chen, The effect of silica fume and steel fiber on the dynamic mechanical performance of high-strength concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, 29(3) (1999) 423-426.
  5. Wu, C. Shi, K. Khayat, Influence of silica fume content on microstructure development and bond to steel fiber in ultra-high strength cement-based materials (UHSC), Cement and Concrete Composites, 71 (2016) 97-109.
  6. Chu, A. Kwan, Co-addition of metakaolin and silica fume in mortar: effects and advantages, Construction and Building Materials, 197 (2019) 716-724.
  7. R.C. Tavares, J.F.T. Junior, L.M. Costa, A.C. da Silva Bezerra, P.R. Cetlin, M.T.P. Aguilar, Influence of quartz powder and silica fume on the performance of Portland cement, Scientific Reports, 10(1) (2020) 1-15.
  8. Richardson, G. Groves, The incorporation of minor and trace elements into calcium silicate hydrate (C- S- H) gel in hardened cement pastes, Cement and Concrete Research, 23(1) (1993) 131-138.
  9. Lothenbach, K. Scrivener, R. Hooton, Supplementary cementitious materials, Cement and concrete research, 41(12) (2011) 1244-1256.
  10. A. Ramezanianpour, Cement replacement materials, Springer Geochemistry/Mineralogy, DOI, 10 (2014) 978-973.
  11. K. Mehta, P.J. Monteiro, Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials, McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.
  12. Banar, P. Dashti, A. Zolfagharnasab, A.M. Ramezanianpour, A.A. Ramezanianpour, A comprehensive comparison between using silica fume in the forms of water slurry or blended cement in mortar/concrete, Journal of Building Engineering, 46 (2022) 103802.
  13. Nežerka, P. Bílý, V. Hrbek, J. Fládr, Impact of silica fume, fly ash, and metakaolin on the thickness and strength of the ITZ in concrete, Cement and concrete composites, 103 (2019) 252-262.
  14. A. Rossignolo, Effect of silica fume and SBR latex on the paste aggregate interfacial transition zone, Materials Research, 10(1) (2007) 83-86.
  15. Mehta, D.K. Ashish, Silica fume and waste glass in cement concrete production: A review, Journal of Building Engineering, 29 (2020) 100888.
  16. I. Khan, R. Siddique, Utilization of silica fume in concrete: Review of durability properties, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 57 (2011) 30-35.
  17. Shen, J. Kang, Y. Jiao, M. Li, C. Li, Effects of different silica fume dosages on early-age behavior and cracking resistance of high strength concrete under restrained condition, Construction and Building Materials, 263 (2020) 120218.
  18. Canpolat, Sulfate resistance of mortars containing silica fume and pozzolan, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials, 165(2) (2012) 65-72.
  19. Sounthararajan, K. Srinivasan, A. Sivakumar, Micro filler effects of silica-fume on the setting and hardened properties of concrete, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 6(14) (2013) 2649-2654.
  20. F.M. Zain, M. Safiuddin, H. Mahmud, Development of high performance concrete using silica fume at relatively high water–binder ratios, Cement and concrete research, 30(9) (2000) 1501-1505.
  21. Demirboğa, İ. Türkmen, M.B. Karakoc, Relationship between ultrasonic velocity and compressive strength for high-volume mineral-admixtured concrete, Cement and concrete research, 34(12) (2004) 2329-2336.
  22. Mazloom, A. Ramezanianpour, J. Brooks, Effect of silica fume on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete, Cement and Concrete Composites, 26(4) (2004) 347-357.
  23. Frıas, M.S. De Rojas, J. Cabrera, The effect that the pozzolanic reaction of metakaolin has on the heat evolution in metakaolin-cement mortars, Cement and concrete research, 30(2) (2000) 209-216.
  24. Pilvar, A.A. Ramezanianpour, H. Rajaie, S.M.M. Karein, Practical evaluation of rapid tests for assessing the chloride resistance of concretes containing silica fume, Computers and Concrete, 18(4) (2016) 793.
  25. Assi, K. Carter, E.E. Deaver, R. Anay, P. Ziehl, Sustainable Concrete: Building a greener future, Journal of cleaner production, 198 (2018) 1641-1651.
  26. C.S. Illankoon, V.W. Tam, K.N. Le, J. Wang, Life cycle costing for obtaining concrete credits in green star rating system in Australia, Journal of cleaner production, 172 (2018) 4212-4219.
  27. M. Rahla, R. Mateus, L. Bragança, Comparative sustainability assessment of binary blended concretes using Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) and Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), Journal of Cleaner Production, 220 (2019) 445-459.
  28. C. Holland, Silica fume user's manual, Federal Highway Administration,
  29. Moodi, S. Lashkari, P. Dashti, Durability of cement-based and geopolymer coating mortars in the Persian Gulf simulated environment, Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, (Articles in Press) (2022).
  30. Dotto, A. De Abreu, D. Dal Molin, I. Müller, Influence of silica fume addition on concretes physical properties and on corrosion behavior of reinforcement bars, Cement and concrete composites, 26(1) (2004) 31-39.
  31. Behnood, H. Ziari, Effects of silica fume addition and water to cement ratio on the properties of high-strength concrete after exposure to high temperatures, Cement and Concrete Composites, 30(2) (2008) 106-112.
  32. -W. Song, S.-W. Pack, S.-H. Nam, J.-C. Jang, V. Saraswathy, Estimation of the permeability of silica fume cement concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 24(3) (2010) 315-321.
  33. M.M. Karein, A. Ramezanianpour, T. Ebadi, S. Isapour, M. Karakouzian, A new approach for application of silica fume in concrete: Wet granulation, Construction and Building Materials, 157 (2017) 573-581.
  34. Shekarchi, A. Rafiee, H. Layssi, Long-term chloride diffusion in silica fume concrete in harsh marine climates, Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(10) (2009) 769-775.
  35. Neville, Good reinforced concrete in the Arabian Gulf, Materials and structures, 33(10) (2000) 655-664.
  36. Latawiec, P. Woyciechowski, K.J. Kowalski, Sustainable concrete performance—CO2-emission, Environments, 5(2) (2018) 27.
  37. -J. Kwon, X.-Y. Wang, Optimization of the mixture design of low-CO2 high-strength concrete containing silica fume, Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019 (2019).
  38. Bragança, R. Mateus, H. Koukkari, Building sustainability assessment, Sustainability, 2(7) (2010).
  39. Mateus, S. Neiva, L. Bragança, P. Mendonça, M. Macieira, Sustainability assessment of an innovative lightweight building technology for partition walls–comparison with conventional technologies, Building and Environment, 67 (2013) 147-159.
  40. R. Teixeira, R. Mateus, A.F. Camoes, L. Bragança, F.G. Branco, Comparative environmental life-cycle analysis of concretes using biomass and coal fly ashes as partial cement replacement material, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112 (2016) 2221-2230.
  41. ASTM C150 / C150M-20, Standard Specification for Portland Cement, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
  42. ASTM C1240-15, Standard Specification for Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
  43. ASTM C33 / C33M-18, Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
  44. ASTM C494 / C494M-19, Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.
  45. ISO, I. (2010). "9277: 2010 Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption–BET method." Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
  46. ASTM C109 / C109M-20b, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50 mm] Cube Specimens), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
  47. ASTM C305-20, Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
  48. ASTM C187-16, Standard Test Method for Amount of Water Required for Normal Consistency of Hydraulic Cement Paste, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
  49. ASTM C191-13, Standard Test Methods for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.
  50. ASTM C1437-20, Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
  51. ASTM C1585-20, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
  52. Designation: FM 5-578, “Florida Method of Test for Concrete Resistivity as an Electrical Indicator of its Permeability”, 2004.
  53. Dı́az-Balteiro, C. Romero, In search of a natural systems sustainability index, Ecological Economics, 49(3) (2004) 401-405.
  54. Hofstetter, Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment: a structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere, and value sphere, Springer Science & Business Media, 1998.
  55. ] S. Sala, A.K. Cerutti, R. Pant, Development of a weighting approach for the Environmental Footprint, Luxembourg: European Commission, (2018).
  56. Nochaiya, W. Wongkeo, A. Chaipanich, Utilization of fly ash with silica fume and properties of Portland cement–fly ash–silica fume concrete, Fuel, 89(3) (2010) 768-774.
  57. Kong, X. Du, S. Wei, H. Zhang, Y. Yang, S.P. Shah, Influence of nano-silica agglomeration on microstructure and properties of the hardened cement-based materials, Construction and Building Materials, 37 (2012) 707-715.
  58. Temperley, Corrosion phenomena in the coastal areas of the Persian Gulf, Corrosion Science, 5(8) (1965) 581-589.
  59. F. Pistilli, R. Wintersteen, R. Cechner, The uniformity and influence of silica fume from a US source on the properties of Portland cement concrete, Cement, concrete and aggregates, 6(2) (1984) 120-124.
  60. AIshamsi, K. Alhosani, K. Yousri, Hydrophobic materials, superplasticizer and microsilica effects on setting of cement pastes at various temperatures, Magazine of concrete research, 49(179) (1997) 111-115.
  61. Brooks, M.M. Johari, M. Mazloom, Effect of admixtures on the setting times of high-strength concrete, Cement and Concrete Composites, 22(4) (2000) 293-301.
  62. Zaw, Effect of Silica Fume on the Properties of Concrete, International Journal of Engineering Research and Advanced Technology-IJERAT (ISSN: 2454-6135), 5(8) (2019) 55-59.
  63. K. Kwan, H. Wong, Packing density of cementitious materials: part 2—packing and flow of OPC+ PFA+ CSF, Materials and structures, 41(4) (2008) 773-784.
  64. Li, A. Kwan, Ternary blending of cement with fly ash microsphere and condensed silica fume to improve the performance of mortar, Cement and Concrete Composites, 49 (2014) 26-35.
  65. Hendi, H. Rahmani, D. Mostofinejad, A. Tavakolinia, M. Khosravi, Simultaneous effects of microsilica and nanosilica on self-consolidating concrete in a sulfuric acid medium, Construction and Building Materials, 152 (2017) 192-205.
  66. D. Abyaneh, H. Wong, N. Buenfeld, Computational investigation of capillary absorption in concrete using a three-dimensional mesoscale approach, Computational Materials Science, 87 (2014) 54-64.
  67. Mohan, K. Mini, Strength and durability studies of SCC incorporating silica fume and ultra fine GGBS, Construction and Building Materials, 171 (2018) 919-928.
  68. Sadrmomtazi, B. Tahmouresi, R. Kohani Khoshkbijari, Effect of fly ash and silica fume on transition zone, pore structure and permeability of concrete, Magazine of Concrete Research, 70(10) (2018) 519-532.
  69. A. Ramezanianpour, E.R. Dehkordi, A.M. Ramezanianpour, Influence of Sulfate Ions on Chloride Attack in Concrete Mortars Containing Silica Fume and Jajrood Trass, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 44(4) (2020) 1135-1144.
  70. Frischknecht, F. Wyss, S.B. Knöpfel, P. Stolz, Life cycle assessment in the building sector: analytical tools, environmental information and labels, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(4) (2015) 421-425.
  71. Abbe, L. Hamilton, BRE Global Environmental Weighting for Construction Products using Selected Parameters from EN 15804, in, Watford, 2017.
  72. BSI, BS EN 15643: 2010. Part 1: Sustainability of construction works. Sustainability of buildings. General Framework, in, BSI London, UK, 2010.
  73. Wałach, P. Dybeł, J. Sagan, M. Gicala, Environmental performance of ordinary and new generation concrete structures—a comparative analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(4) (2019) 3980-3990.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 434
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 384


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب