پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 9 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 448 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,737 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,060,762 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,560,941 |
Experimental Study on the Effect of Waste Rubber Powder and Zeolite Replacement on Cemented Sandy Soil | ||
| AUT Journal of Civil Engineering | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 1، 2024، صفحه 3-16 اصل مقاله (1.03 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22060/ajce.2024.22739.5846 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abdolreza Karimi* ؛ Masoud Amelsakhi؛ Reza Yousefi؛ Amir Abbas Amooei | ||
| Department of Civil Engineering, Qom University of Technology, Qom, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Soil improvement involves a variety of approaches. Among them, the addition of specific materials has been widely adopted in the literature. Colossal numbers of worn tires are released into the environment every year. It will cause serious environmental issues. Moreover, the cement production process causes detrimental consequences for the environment, but it still is considered as one of the main options in construction projects. So, the main purpose of this research is to find suitable alternative methods to decrease cement usage. In this paper, the effect of adding zeolite and waste rubber powder on the unconfined compression strength (UCS) of soil was investigated. Two types of sandy soil were adopted in this study, SP and SW soil. In order to improve these two types of soils, 4% by weight cement, 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75% rubber powder, and 0, 10, 30, and 50% zeolite replacement with the cement during curing periods of 7, 14, and 28 days were considered. According to the compaction test results, by increasing the percentage of rubber powder, the maximum dry density and the optimal moisture content of both types of soils decreases. However, with zeolite addition, the maximum dry density of both types of soils has decreased and the value of optimum moisture has increased. The optimum percentage of zeolite and rubber powder in SW soil was 30% and 0.5% respectively, while in SP soil these amounts were 10% and 0.25% respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Sandy Soil؛ Waste Rubber Powder؛ Zeolite؛ Cement؛ UCS Test | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Yilmaz, E., Belem T., Benzaazoua, M. (2015). “Specimen size effect on strength behavior of cemented paste backfills subjected to different placement conditions.” Engineering Geology, 185, pp. 52-62.
[2] Horpibulsuk, S., Suddeepong, A., Suksiripattanapong, C., Chinkulkijniwat, A., Arulrajah, A., Disfani, M. (2014). “Water-void to cement ratio identity of lightweight cellular-cemented material.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26(10), pp. 1096-1105.
[3] Bildrici, M. (2019). “Cement production, environmental pollution and economic growth: evidence from China and USA.” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21, pp. 783-793.
[4] Gunaratne, M. (2013). “The foundation engineering handbook.” Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press.
[5] Tobon, J., Restrepo, O., Paya, J. (2010). “Comparative analysis of performance of portland cement blended with nano silica and silica fume.” Dyna Magazine, 163, pp. 37-48.
[6] Harpel, C. J., Kyle, P. R., Dunbar, N. W. (2008). “Englacial tephrostratigraphy of Erebus volcano, Antarctica.” Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 177, pp. 549-568.
[7] Weckhuysen, B. M., Yu, J. (2015). “Recent advances in zeolite chemistry and catalysis.” Chemical Society Reviews, 44(20), pp. 7022-7024.
[8] Baerlocher, C., McCusker, L., Olson, D. H. (2007), Atlas of zeolite framework types, Elsevier Science.
[9] Fertu, T., Gavrilescu, M. (2012). “Application of natural zeolites as sorbents in the clean-up of aqueous streams.” Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 11(1), pp. 867-878.
[10] Weitkamp, J. (2000). “Zeolites and catalysis.” Solid State Ionics. 131, pp. 175-188.
[11] Turer, A. (2012). “Recycling of Scrap Tires.” Material Recycling-Trends and Perspectives, Intech Open Publisher, pp. 195-212.
[12] ASTM D6270-08, (2014). Standard Practice for Use of Scrap Tires in Civil Engineering Applications.
[13] ACI Committee 230. (1997). “State of the Art report on soil cement.” ACI. 230.1R-90. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, pp. 1-23.
[14] MolaAbasi, H., Shooshpasha, I. (2016). “Influence of zeolite and cement additions on mechanical behavior of sandy soil.” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 8, pp. 746-752.
[15] Demirbas, G. (2009). “Stabilization of expansive soils using bigadic zeolite.” PhD Thesis, University of METU, Ankara, Turkey.
[16] Hong, S. (2015). “Geotechnical laboratory characterization of sand zeolite mixtures.” Master Thesis, USA.
[17] Kordnaeij, A., Ziaie Moayed, R., Soleimani, M. (2019). “Unconfined compressive strength of loose sandy soils grouted with zeolite and cement.” Soils and Foundations, 59, pp. 905–919.
[18] Ahmadi Chenarboni, H., Lajevardi, S. H., MolaAbasi, H., Zeighami, E. (2021). “The effect of zeolite and cement stabilization on the mechanical behavior of expansive soils.” Construction and Building Materials, 272, 121630.
[19] Izadpanah, S., Shooshpasha. I., Hajiannia, A. (2021). “The impact of zeolite on mineralogy changes and compressive strength development of cement-treated sand mixtures through microstructure analysis.” Scientia Iranica, 28(3), pp. 1182-1194.
[20] Soltani, M. S., Jiryaei Sharahi, M., Amelsakhi, M. “Effect of zeolite and tire granules on cement stabilization of the sand.” Amirkabir Civil Engineering Journal, 54(2), pp. 759-774.
[21] Sarajpoor, S., Kavand, A., Zogh, P., Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2020). “Dynamic behavior of sand-rubber mixtures based on hollow cylinder tests.” Construction and Building Materials, 251, 118948.
[22] Akbarimehr, D., Eslami, A., Aflaki, E. (2020). “Geotechnical behaviour of clay soil mixed with rubber waste.” Journal of Cleaner Production.
[23] Anvari, S. M., Shooshpasha, I., Soleimani Kutanaei, S. (2017). “Effect of granulated rubber on shear strength of fine-grained sand.” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9, pp. 936-944.
[24] Ghareh, S., Akhlaghi, F., Yazdani, K. (2020). “A study on the effects of waste rubber tire dimensions on fine-grained soil behavior.” Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 8(3), pp. 15-33.
[25] Annual Book of ASTM D2487 Standards. (2012). “Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
[26] Annual Book of ASTM D698 Standards. (2012). “Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
[27] Annual Book of ASTM D4253 Standards. (2012). “Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
[28] Annual Book of ASTM D4254 Standards. (2012). “Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
[29] Annual Book of ASTM D854 Standards. (2012). “Standard test for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
[30] Annual Book of ASTM C136 Standards. (2012). “Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
[31] Annual Book of ASTM C150 Standards. (2012). “Standard specifications for cements.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
[32] Annual Book of ASTM D2166 Standards. (2012). “Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken.
[33] Al-Bared, M. A. M., Marto, A., Latifi, N. (2018). “Utilization of recycled tiles and tyres in stabilization of soils and production of construction materials–A state-of-the-art review.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(10), pp. 3860-3874. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 399 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 357 |
||