| تعداد نشریات | 8 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 439 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,658 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,725,016 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,359,210 |
Optimizing Dynamic Scheduling in Construction with BIM: A Framework for Budget-Constrained Resource Management | ||
| AUT Journal of Civil Engineering | ||
| دوره 9، شماره 3، بهمن 2025، صفحه 233-252 اصل مقاله (2.25 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22060/ajce.2025.23350.5873 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ali akbar shirzadi javid* ؛ Shahrzad Omrani؛ Sahar Falegari | ||
| School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Project scheduling is a fundamental part of construction management, as it controls activity timing, costs, and resource allocation. Despite the available tools for planning a project, such an important role still relies heavily on the scheduler's experience and goes through many trial-and-error situations during the project. This research develops a new framework for time and resource allocation optimization in a project to further facilitate project planning. The framework also attempts to gather, store, and process all of the project’s data in order to achieve an accurate estimation. Building Information Modeling (BIM) was used to store the necessary data, and after defining the constraints, the model was transferred to Simphony.NET via a Visual Basic (VB.NET) data-exchange module that queried and exported task dependencies, resource limitations, and budget constraints stored in an MS Access database. The transfer mechanism preserved the relational data schema (foreign keys linking tasks, resources, and costs), thereby ensuring interoperability and preventing data loss. Finally, the ant colony algorithm was used for optimization. The outcome was compared to a real-life case study, and the reliability of the algorithm was validated. Results show that compared to the actual project duration of 108 days and the contractor’s initial planned duration of 90 days, our model predicted 97 days. This reduced the time estimation error from 16% (initial vs. actual) to 10% (model vs. actual). Furthermore, relative to the actual project outcome, the optimized schedule achieved an 18% improvement in project duration and a 13% reduction in total cost. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Resource Allocation؛ Dynamic Scheduling؛ Building Information Modeling؛ Optimization | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] L. Zhang, J. Du, S. Zhang, Solution to the time-cost-quality trade-off problem in construction projects based on immune genetic particle swarm optimization, Journal of Management in Engineering, 30 (2014) 163–172.
[2] P.-H. Chen, H. Weng, A two-phase GA model for resource-constrained project scheduling, Automation in Construction, 18 (2009) 485–498.
[3] J. M. Nicholas, H. Steyn, Project Management for Business, Engineering, and Technology: Principles and Practice, Elsevier, 2008.
[4] M. Vanhoucke, Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling, Springer, 2012.
[5] D. Merkle, M. Middendorf, H. Schmeck, Ant colony optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6 (2002) 333–346.
[6] S.-S. Liu, C.-J. Wang, Optimizing linear project scheduling with multi-skilled crews, Automation in Construction, 24 (2012) 16–23.
[7] N. Damak, B. Jarboui, P. Siarry, Differential evolution for solving multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems, Computers & Operations Research, 36 (2009) 2653–2659.
[8] S. Adhau, M. L. Mittal, A. Mittal, A multi-agent system for distributed multi-project scheduling: An auction-based negotiation approach, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25 (2012) 1738–1751.
[9] W. Wiesemann, D. Kuhn, B. Rustem, Multi-resource allocation in stochastic project scheduling, Annals of Operations Research, 193 (2012) 193–220.
[10] M.-Y. Cheng, D.-H. Tran, Y.-W. Wu, Using a fuzzy clustering chaotic-based differential evolution with serial method to solve resource-constrained project scheduling problems, Automation in Construction, 37 (2014) 88–97.
[11] R. R. Politi, Project Planning and Management Using Building Information Modeling (BIM), Izmir Institute of Technology (Turkey), 2018.
[12] I. Howell, B. Batcheler, Building information modeling two years later–huge potential, some success and several limitations, The Laiserin Letter, 22 (2005) 3521–3528.
[13] M. B. Barison, E. T. Santos, An overview of BIM specialists, Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Proceedings of the ICCCBE2010, (2010) 141.
[14] Ö. Demirtas-Bagdonas, Reading Turkey's foreign policy on Syria: The AKP's construction of a great power identity and the politics of grandeur, Turkish Studies, 15 (2014) 139–155.
[15] H. Abdirad, Advancing in building information modeling (BIM) contracting: Trends in the AEC/FM industry, AEI 2015, (2015) 1–12.
[16] S. Azhar, Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry, Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11 (2011) 241–252.
[17] C. M. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, K. Liston, BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
[18] P. C. Suermann, Evaluating the Impact of Building Information Modeling (BIM) on Construction, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, 2009.
[19] J. E. Kelley Jr., Critical-path planning and scheduling: Mathematical basis, Operations Research, 9 (1961) 296–320.
[20] J. W. Fondahl, A Non-computer Approach to the Critical Path Method for the Construction Industry, 1962.
[21] W. Prager, A structural method of computing project cost polygons, Management Science, 9 (1963) 394–404.
[22] N. Siemens, A simple CPM time-cost tradeoff algorithm, Management Science, 17 (1971) B-354–B-363.
[23] O. Moselhi, Schedule compression using the direct stiffness method, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 20 (1993) 65–72.
[24] J. C. Bean, Genetic algorithms and random keys for sequencing and optimization, ORSA Journal on Computing, 6 (1994) 154–160.
[25] P. Ghoddousi, E. Eshtehardian, S. Jooybanpour, A. Javanmardi, Multi-mode resource-constrained discrete time–cost–resource optimization in project scheduling using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, Automation in Construction, 30 (2013) 216–227.
[26] S. Luo, C. Wang, J. Wang, Ant colony optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling with generalized precedence relations, Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, (2003) IEEE.
[27] W.-C. Wang, S.-W. Weng, S.-H. Wang, H.-H. Chen, Integrating building information models with construction process simulations for project scheduling support, Automation in Construction, 37 (2014) 68–80.
[28] D. Hu, Y. Mohamed, H. Taghaddos, M. R. Fayek, A simulation-based method for effective workface planning of industrial construction projects, Construction Management and Economics, 36 (2018) 328–347.
[29] M. E. Gandomkar Armaki, A. A. Shirzadi Javid, S. Omrani, Dynamic BIM-driven framework for adaptive and optimized construction projects scheduling under uncertainty, Buildings, 15 (2025) 3004.
[30] A. Candelario-Garrido, J. García-Sanz-Calcedo, A. M. R. Rodríguez, A quantitative analysis on the feasibility of 4D planning graphic systems versus conventional systems in building projects, Sustainable Cities and Society, 35 (2017) 378–384.
[31] M. Al-Bataineh, S. AbouRizk, H. Parkis, Using simulation to plan tunnel construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139 (2013) 564–571.
[32] D. N. Kleinmuntz, Resource allocation decisions, Citeseer, 2007.
[33] C. Mellentien, N. Trautmann, Resource allocation with project management software, OR-Spektrum, 23 (2001) 383–394.
[34] R. Zhang, Y.-C. Liang, S. Cui, Dynamic resource allocation in cognitive radio networks, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 27 (2010) 102–114.
[35] S. AbouRizk, Y. Mohamed, Simphony—an integrated environment for construction simulation, Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No. 00CH37165), (2000) IEEE.
[36] H. Liu, M. Al-Hussein, M. Lu, BIM-based integrated approach for detailed construction scheduling under resource constraints, Automation in Construction, 53 (2015) 29–43. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 164 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 245 |
||