پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 7 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 399 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,359 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,118,020 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,745,343 |
Optimal Trajectory Study of a Small Size Waverider and Wing-Body Reentry Vehicle at Suborbital Entry Speed of Approximately 4 km/s with Dynamic Pressure and Heat Rate Constraint | ||
| AUT Journal of Modeling and Simulation | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 44، شماره 2، بهمن 2012، صفحه 29-36 اصل مقاله (403.42 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22060/miscj.2012.126 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| S. Tauqeer ul Islam Rizvi؛ He Linshu؛ Tawfiqur Rahman | ||
| چکیده | ||
| A numerical trajectory optimization study of two types of lifting-entry reentry vehicle has been presented at low suborbital speed of 4.113 km/s and -15 degree entry angle. These orbital speeds are typical of medium range ballistic missile with ballistic range of approximately 2000 km at optimum burnout angle of approximately 41 degree for maximum ballistic range. A lifting reentry greatly enhances the reentry range which leads to a higher overall range of approximately 3000 km for the same ΔV. The optimum reentry angle of lifting reentry vehicle for medium range missiles under constrained g-load lies between -15 to -20 degree for limited g-load trajectories. These entry angles result in high decent rates and the vehicle quickly approaches the heat rate boundary. The heat rate problem is more severe for small size vehicle because of small nose-radius. Limiting the heat rate restricts the trajectory and lowers the downrange/cross-range performance of the reentry vehicle. A wing-body reentry vehicle has a larger nose radius as compared to a waverider which results in comparatively low heat rates during flight. This type of a vehicle has lower lift-to-drag ratio and therefore lesser range in comparison to a waverider type design. The performance of the two vehicle types is studied at various heat rate limits with the objective to calculate the optimum control deflections that would maximize the cross range. The results provide performance of the two designs vis-à-vis maximum heat rate constraint at the stagnation point along with the required control history. General pseudo-spectral optimal control software, GPOPS has been used for the optimal trajectory studies. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| trajectory optimization؛ Optimal control؛ Reentry Guidance؛ Lifting Reentry؛ Conceptual design؛ Ballistic Missiles؛ Radau Pseudospectral Method | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Optimal Trajectory Study of a Small Size Waverider and Wing-Body Reentry Vehicle at Suborbital Entry Speed of Approximately 4 km/s with Dynamic Pressure and Heat Rate Constraint | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| A numerical trajectory optimization study of two types of lifting-entry reentry vehicle has been presented at low suborbital speed of 4.113 km/s and -15 degree entry angle. These orbital speeds are typical of medium range ballistic missile with ballistic range of approximately 2000 km at optimum burnout angle of approximately 41 degree for maximum ballistic range. A lifting reentry greatly enhances the reentry range which leads to a higher overall range of approximately 3000 km for the same ΔV. The optimum reentry angle of lifting reentry vehicle for medium range missiles under constrained g-load lies between -15 to -20 degree for limited g-load trajectories. These entry angles result in high decent rates and the vehicle quickly approaches the heat rate boundary. The heat rate problem is more severe for small size vehicle because of small nose-radius. Limiting the heat rate restricts the trajectory and lowers the downrange/cross-range performance of the reentry vehicle. A wing-body reentry vehicle has a larger nose radius as compared to a waverider which results in comparatively low heat rates during flight. This type of a vehicle has lower lift-to-drag ratio and therefore lesser range in comparison to a waverider type design. The performance of the two vehicle types is studied at various heat rate limits with the objective to calculate the optimum control deflections that would maximize the cross range. The results provide performance of the two designs vis-à-vis maximum heat rate constraint at the stagnation point along with the required control history. General pseudo-spectral optimal control software, GPOPS has been used for the optimal trajectory studies. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| trajectory optimization, Optimal control, Reentry Guidance, Lifting Reentry, Conceptual design, Ballistic Missiles, Radau Pseudospectral Method | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] C. E. Crockrell, L. D. Huebner, and D. B. Finley, "Aerodynamic Performance and Flow Field Characteristics of two wave-rider Derived Hypersonic Cruise Vehicles " in AIAA 33rd Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit Reno, NV: AIAA Paper 95-0736, 1995. [2] T. H. Phillips, "A Common Aero Vehicle (CAV) Model, Description, and Employment Guide," Schafer Corporation for AFRL & AFSPC 2003.
[3] S. A. Whitmore and B. J. Dunbar, "Orbital Space Plane: Past, Present, and Future," in IAA/ ICAS International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition, Dayton, Ohio, 2003.
[4] "X-41 Common Aero Vehicle," GlobalSecurity.org, 2010.
[5] M. S. Parish-II, "Optmality of Aeroassisted Orbital Plane Changes," in Naval Postgraduate School. vol. Maters of Science Thesis Monterey, CA, 1995, p. 110.
[6] W. E. Bornemann and T. E. Surber, "Aerodynamic Design of the Space Shuttle Orbiter."
[7] T. E. Surber and D. C. Oslen, "Shuttle Orbiter Aerodynamic Development," Journal of Spacecraft, vol. 15, pp. 40-47, 1978.
[8] S. A. Whitmore, Daniel W. Banks, B. M. Andersen, and P. R. Jolley, "Driect-Entry, Aerobraking, and Lifting Aerocapture for Human Rated Lunar Return Vehicles," in 44th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2006, p. 29.
[9] F. Zimmermann and A. J. Calise, "Numerical Optimization Study of Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer," Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, vol. 21, pp. 127-133, January-Feburary 1998.
[10] D. G. Hull and J. L. Speyer, "Optimal reentry and Plane Change Trajectories," The Journal of Astronautical Sciences, vol. 30, pp. 117-130, 1982.
[11] S. T. Rizvi and L. He, "Optimal Performance Study of Wing-Body Reentry Vehicle for Medium to Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile Applications," Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, China., 2012.
[12] J. John D. Anderson, "Hypersonic and High Temperature Gas Dynamics," in Hypersonic and High Temperature Gas Dynamics: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1989, pp. 291-292.
[13] J. A. Love and L. W. Neustadt, "A simple re-entry guidance system," Guidance and Control, p. 49, 1963.
[14] C. D. Scot, R. C. Ried, R. J. Maraia, C. P. Li, and S. M. Derri, "An AOTV Aeroheating and Thermal Protection Study," in Thermal Design of Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer Vehicles. vol. 96, F. Nelson, Ed. New York: AIAA, 1985.
[15] E. V. Zoby, K. P. Lee, R. N. Gupta, and R. A. Thompson, "Nonequilibrium Viscous Shock Layers Solutions for Hypersonic Flow Over Slender Bodies," in Eighth National Aero- Space Plane Technology Symposium, Monterey, CA, Mar, 1990.
[16] J. J. Bertin, "Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics," in Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics Washington, DC: AIAA Education Series, 1994, pp. 257-262.
[17] "Launch Vehicle Design," H. Linshu, Ed.: BUAA Press, 2004, pp. 80-87.
[18] C. L. Darby and A. V. Rao, "Minimum-Fuel Low-Earth-Orbit Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer of Small Spacecraft," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 48, Jul.-Aug., 2011.
[19] A. V. Rao, "User's Manual for GPOPS Version 4.0," August, 2011. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,690 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,219 |
||