پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 7 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 404 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,423 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,526,376 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,023,233 |
A Simplified Description of the Uniaxial Tensile Test Used for Calibrating Constitutive Models of Orthotropic Porous Sheet Metals | ||
| AUT Journal of Mechanical Engineering | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 2، شماره 2، اسفند 2018، صفحه 127-136 اصل مقاله (1023.23 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22060/ajme.2018.13862.5693 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| A. Kami* 1؛ D.-S. Comsa2 | ||
| 1Mechanical Engineering Department, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran | ||
| 2CERTETA Research Centre, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In the present work, a simplified model of the uniaxial tensile test is developed for orthotropic metallic sheets. This model is mainly established for tensile test analysis and calibration of material parameters. The constitutive equations included in the model are based on an anisotropic Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model combined with the Hill 1948 quadratic yield criterion. At first, a detailed description of the constitutive equations along with their computer implementation is presented. Then, by comparing the force and void evolution diagrams predicted by the model with numerical and experimental results the efficiency and accuracy of the model are assessed. Finally, the effect of different parameters on the traction force and evolution of voids during uniaxial tensile tests are studied. The material parameters used in the calibration procedure are as follows: initial void volume fraction, two adjusting parameters, nucleation of void volume fraction, standard deviation, mean value of void nucleation strain, and sample orientation with respect to the rolling direction. The tests performed by the authors prove the capability of the simplified model to describe accurately the mechanical response of orthotropic sheet metals. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Gurson damage model؛ Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman؛ Tensile test؛ Parameter calibration؛ Anisotropy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] C. Tipper, The fracture of metals, Metallurgia, 39(231) (1949) 133-137. [2] K. Puttick, Ductile fracture in metals, Philos. Mag., 4(44) (1959) 964-969. [3] F.A. McClintock, A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 35(2) (1968) 363-371. [4] J.R. Rice, D.M. Tracey, On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 17(3) (1969) 201-217. [5] A.L. Gurson, Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth Part I-Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 99(1) (1977) 2-15. [6] V. Tvergaard, Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions, Int J Fracture, 17(4) (1981) 389-407. [7] V. Tvergaard, A. Needleman, Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar, Acta Metall., 32(1) (1984) 157-169. [8] K. Nahshon, J.W. Hutchinson, Modification of the Gurson model for shear failure, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 27(1) (2008) 1-17. [9] A. Kami, B.M. Dariani, A. Sadough Vanini, D.S. Comsa, D. Banabic, Numerical determination of the forming limit curves of anisotropic sheet metals using GTN damage model, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 216(0) (2015) 472-483. [10] Z. Chen, X. Dong, The GTN damage model based on Hill’48 anisotropic yield criterion and its application in sheet metal forming, Comp Mater Sci, 44(3) (2009) 1013-1021. [11] M. Abendroth, M. Kuna, Identification of ductile damage and fracture parameters from the small punch test using neural networks, Eng Fract Mech, 73(6) (2006) 710-725. [12] G. Broggiato, F. Campana, L. Cortese, Identification of material damage model parameters: an inverse approach using digital image processing, Meccanica, 42(1) (2007) 9-17. [13] A. Kami, B. Mollaei Dariani, D.-S. Comsa, D. Banabic, A. Sadough Vanini, M. Liewald, Calibration of GTN damage model parameters using hydraulic bulge test, Rom. J. Techn. Sci. Appl. Mechanics, 61(3) (2016) 248-264 [14] H.H. Nguyen, T.N. Nguyen, H.C. Vu, Ductile fracture prediction and forming assessment of AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheets, Int J Fracture, 209(1) (2018) 143-162. [15] M. Abbasi, M.A. Shafaat, M. Ketabchi, D.F. Haghshenas, M. Abbasi, Application of the GTN model to predict the forming limit diagram of IF-Steel, J Mech Sci Technol, 26(2) (2012) 345-352. [16] A. Kami, B. Mollaei Dariani, A. Sadough Vanini, D.-S. Comsa, D. Banabic, Application of a GTN Damage Model to Predict the Fracture of Metallic Sheets Subjected to Deep-Drawing, Proc Rom Acad Ser A, 15(3) (2014) 300-309. [17] R. Hill, A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals, Proc R Soc Lond A-Math Phys Eng Sci, 193(1033) (1948) 281-297. [18] R. Kiran, K. Khandelwal, Gurson model parameters for ductile fracture simulation in ASTM A992 steels, Fatigue Fract Eng M, 37(2) (2013) 1-13. [19] N. Benseddiq, A. Imad, A ductile fracture analysis using a local damage model, Int J Pres Ves Pip, 85(4) (2008) 219-227. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,015 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 663 |
||