پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 7 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 399 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,389 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,288,012 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,882,748 |
ارزیابی عملکرد مسلح کننده ژئو اسکرپ تایر با اعضای عرضی افقی با استفاده از آزمایش بزرگ مقیاس بیرون کشش | ||
| نشریه مهندسی عمران امیرکبیر | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 53، شماره 4، تیر 1400، صفحه 1459-1478 اصل مقاله (1.94 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22060/ceej.2019.16959.6408 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهرداد تاج آبادی پور1؛ مسعود دهقانی* 1؛ بهزاد کلانتری1؛ سید حمید لاجوردی2 | ||
| 1گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی مهندسی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندر عباس، ایران | ||
| 2گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این مقاله با استفاده از آزمایش‌های بیرون کشش بزرگ مقیاس (0/8×0/8×1/4متر) به ارزیابی عملکرد نوارهای لاستیک فرسوده با اعضای عرضی افقی (ژئو اسکرپ تایر) به عنوان المان‌های تسلیح در دیوارهای خاک مسلح پرداخته شده‌است. در این راستا نتایج آزمایشگاهی ژئو اسکرپ تایر با مقادیر تئوری و سه مسلح کننده‌ی متداول نوار ژئوسینتتیکی، نوار فولادی و نوار فولادی آجدار مقایسه شده‌است. نتایج آزمایش‌های بیرون کشش نشان می‌دهند که مسلح کننده‌ی پیشنهادی عملکرد بهتری نسبت به سایر مسلح کننده‌های متداول داشته و مقاومت بیرون کشیدگی را نسبت به نوار فولادی، نوار ژئوسینتتیکی و نوار فولادی آجدار بیش از 3، 2/5 و 1/5 برابر افزایش می دهد. افزایش مقاومت بیرون کشیدگی با افزودن تعداد اعضای عرضی متاثر از پارامتر S/B (نسبت فاصله به عرض اعضای عرضی) بوده‌است و افزودن سه عضو عرضی مقاومت بیرون کشیدگی را نسبت به نوار فولادی، نوار ژئوسینتتیکی و نوار فولادی آجدار بیش از5/9، 4/9 و3/2 برابر افزایش داده‌است. بنابراین با استفاده از المان تسلیح ژئو اسکرپ تایر با سه عضو عرضی افقی نیاز به طول کمتری (کمتر از 30 درصد) نسبت به سایر المان‌های تسلیح نواری متداول (نوار فولادی، نوار ژئوسینتتیکی و نوار فولادی آجدار) بوده‌است. لذا با بهره گرفتن از این سیستم می‌توان افق جدیدی را در حل معضل لاستیک‌های فرسوده گشوده و مهندسین ژئوتکنیک را در دستیابی به سیستم‌های برتر و اقتصادیتر دیوارهای خاک مسلح مطمئن ساخت. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مقاومت بیرون کشیدگی؛ ژئواسکرپ تایر؛ دیوار خاک مسلح؛ اعضای عرضی؛ آزمایش بزرگ مقیاس بیرون کشش | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| بهسازی خاک ها؛ خاک مسلح؛ دیوار های حائل صلب و انعطاف پذیر | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of the performance of Geo Scrap Tire reinforcement with horizontal transverse members by large-scale pullout test | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mehrdad Tajabadipour1؛ masoud Dehghani1؛ Behzad Kalantari1؛ Seyed Hamid Lajevardi2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate,Department of Civil Engineering,University of Hormozgan, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In this paper, the performance of the strip of scrap tires (Geo Scrap Tire(GST)) with horizontal transverse members evaluates as reinforcement elements in mechanically stabilized earth walls (MSEWs) by a large scale pullout test (i.e. 1.4 m × 0.8 m × 0.8 m). In this regard, the experimental pullout results of GST reinforcement compared with theoretical equations and conventional reinforcement of Geosynthetic Strip (GS), Steel Strip (ST), and Steel Strip with Rib (STR). The experimental pullout results showed that the innovative suggested reinforcement element performed better than the other strips so that the GST strip was capable of increasing pullout resistance by more than 3, 2.5, and 1.5 times compared to the steel strip, the geosynthetic strip, and the ribbed steel strip. The results show maximum pullout resistance of GST affected by the S/B ratio and adding three horizontal transverse members can be increasing pullout resistance by more than 5.9, 4.9, and 3.2 times compared to ST, GS, and STR. Thus, using GST reinforcement with three horizontal transverse members needs a smaller length (less than 30%) comparing to conventional strip reinforcement (ST, GS, STR). Therefore, using Geo Scrap Tire reinforcement can open a new horizon in solving the problem of scrap tires and assure geotechnical engineers in achieving superior and more economical systems of reinforced soil walls. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Pullout Resistance, Geo Scrap Tire, Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls, Transverse Member, Large-Scale Pullout Tests | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Design of Retaining Walls, Management and Planning Organization (in Persian), (2005). [2] D.T. Bergado, R. Shivashankar, M.C. Alfaro, j.-c. chai, S. Balasubramaniam, Interaction Behaviour of Steel Grid Reinforcements in A Clayey Sand, Geotechnique, 43(4) (1993) 589-603. [3] R. Jewell, G. Milligan, D. Dubois, Interaction Between Soil and Geogrids, in: Polymer grid reinforcement, Thomas Telford Publishing, 1984, pp. 18-30. [4] E. Palmeria, G. Milligan, Scale and Other Factors Affecting the Results Of Pull-Out Tests of Grids Buried in Sand, Geotechnique, 39(3) (1989) 511-542. [5] D.T. Bergado, J.C. Chai, H.O. Abiera, M.C. Alfaro, A.S. Balasubramaniam, Interaction Between Cohesive-Frictional soil and various grid reinforcements, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, (1993). [6] E.M. Palmeira, Bearing force mobilisation in pull-out tests on geogrids, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 22(6) (2004), 481-509. [7] M.R. Abdi , S.A. Sadrnejad, M.A. Arjomand, Clay reinforcement using geogrid embedded in thin layers of sand, International Journal of Civil Engineerng, (2009). [8] A. Nayeri , K. Fakharian Study on Pullout Behavior Of Uniaxial HDPE Geogrids Under Monotonic and Cyclic Loads, International Journal of Civil Engineerng, (2009). [9] S.H. Lajevardi, D. Dias, J. Racinais, Analysis of soil-welded steel mesh reinforcement interface interaction by pull-out tests, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, (2013). [10] K. Sukmak, P. Sukmak, S. Horpibulsuk, J. Han, S.-L. Shen, A. Arulrajah, Effect of fine content on the pullout resistance mechanism of bearing reinforcement embedded in cohesive–frictional soils, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 43(2), (2015), 107-117. [11] C.S. Vieira, P.M. Pereira, M. de Lurdes Lopes, Recycled construction and demolition wastes as filling material for geosynthetic reinforced structures. interface properties, Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, (2016), 299-311. [12] M. Pinho-Lopes, A.M. Paula, M.L. Lopes, Soil–geosynthetic interaction in pullout and inclined-plane shear for two geosynthetics exhumed after installation damage, Geosynthetics International, (2016). [13] H. Aldeeky, O.A. Hattamleh, B.A. Alfoul, Effect of Sand Placement Method on the Interface Friction of Sand and Geotextile, Int. J. Civ. Eng, (2016). [14] M. Abdi, H. Mirzaeifar, Experimental and PIV evaluation of grain size and distribution on soil–geogrid interactions in pullout test, Soils and Foundations, 57(6) (2017) 1045-1058. [15] D.K. Jong-Beom Park, S. Yang and J.H. Kim, Pullout Characteristics of Geosynthetics Reinforced Earth Using Multilayer Spreading Pullout Test, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, (2017). [16] G. Cardile, D. Gioffrè, N. Moraci, L. Calvarano, Modelling interference between the geogrid bearing members under pullout loading conditions, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 45(3) (2017) 169-177. [17] C. Kayadelen, T. ÖkkeşÖnal, G. Altay, Experimental Study for Pull-out Load of Reinforced Sand Soil with Geogrid, Measurement, (2017). [18] A. Noorzad, E.Badakhshan, Investigations on pullout behavior of geogrid-granular trench using CANAsand constitutive model, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, (2017). [19] A. Hegde, R. Roy, A Comparative Numerical Study on Soil–Geosynthetic Interactions Using Large Scale Direct Shear Test and Pullout Test, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, (2018). [20] F. malayeri, Evaluation and study of Latest Waste Tire Recycling Technologies, Iranian Rubber Industry Journal (in Persian), (2014). [21] D.N. Humphrey, W.L. Nickels, Effect of tire chips as lightweight fill on pavement performance, Proc.,14th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, New Delhi, India,, (1997) 1617-1620. [22] J. Lee, R. Salgado, A. Bernal, C. Lovell, Shredded tires and rubber-sand as lightweight backfill, Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 125(2) (1999) 132-141. [23] Y.W. Yoon, S.H. Cheon, D. Kang, Bearing capacity and settlement of tire-reinforced sands, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 22(5) (2004) 439- 453. [24] S. Youwai, D.T. Bergado, Numerical analysis reinforced wall using rubber tire chips-sand mixtures as backfill material, Computers and Geotechnics, (2004) 103-114. [25] P. Gotteland, S. Lambert, L. Balachowski, Strength characteristics of tyre chips-sand mixtures, (2005). [26] N. Hataf, M. Rahimi, Experimental investigation of bearing capacity of sand reinforced with randomly distributed tire shreds, Construction and Building Materials, 20(10) (2006) 910-916. [27] S. Akbulut, S. Arasan, E. Kalkan, Modification of clayey soils using scrap tire rubber and synthetic fibers, Applied Clay Science, 38(1-2) (2007) 23-32. [28] A. Nakhaee, S.M. Marandi, Reducing the forces caused by earthquake on retaining walls using granulated rubber-soil mixture, International Journal of Engineering, 24, No. 4, (2011) 337-350. [29] V.K. D. Mohan, H. Kim, U. Balunaini, M. Prezzi, Pullout capacity of ladder-type metal reinforcements in tire shred-sand mixtures, Construction and Building Materials, 113 (2016) 544-552. [30] G. Gill, R.K. Mittal, Use of waste tire-chips in shallow footings subjected to eccentric loading-an experimental study, Construction and Building Materials, 199 (2019) 335-348. [31] FHWA, Design and construction of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, National, (2009). [32] ASTMD698–07, Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)), (2007). [33] ASTMD5321, Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method, ASTM Designation: D5321-02, ASTM, U.S.A., (2009). [34] ASTMD6270, Standard practice for use of scrap tires in civil engineering applications, in, American Society for Testing and Materials West Conshohocken, PA, 2012. [35] K. Ab-Malek, A. Stevenson, The effect of 42 year immersion in sea-water on natural rubber, Journal of materials science, 21(1) 147-154 (1986). [36] ASTMD6706, Standard test method for measuring geosynthetic pullout resistance in soil, in, ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA, 2013. [37] N. Moraci, P. Recalcati, Factors affecting the pullout behaviour of extruded geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24(4) (2006) 220-242. [38] R.j. fanninan, D.M. raju, on the pullout resistance of geosynthetics, Can. Geotech. J., (1993). [39] M. Khedkar, J. Mandal, Pullout behaviour of cellular reinforcements, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(4) (2009) 262-271. [40] L.M. Peterson, L.R. Anderson, Pullout resistance of welded wire mesh embeded in soil, Report to the Hilfiker Company, Utah State University, (1980). [41] D.T. Bergado, J.C. Chai, N. Miura, Prediction of pullout resistance and pullout force-displacement relationship for inextensible grid reinforcements, Soils and foundations, 36(4) (1996) 11-22. [42] D. Bergado, R. Shivashankar, M. Alfaro, J.-C. Chai, A. Balasubramaniam, Interaction behaviour of steel grid reinforcements in a clayey sand, Geotechnique, 43(4) (1993) 589-603. [43] S. Horpibulsuk, A. Niramitkornburee, Pullout resistance of bearing reinforcement embedded in sand, Soils and Foundations, 50(2) (2010) 215-226. [44] M. Alfaro, S. Hayashi, N. Miura, K. Watanabe, Pullout interaction mechanism of geogrid strip reinforcement, Geosynthetics international, 2(4) (1995) 679-698. [45] E.M. Palmeira, Soil–geosynthetic interaction: modelling and analysis, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(5) 368-390 (2009). [46] C. Suksiripattanapong, S. Horpibulsuk, A. Chinkulkijniwat, J.C. Chai, Pullout resistance of bearing reinforcement embedded in coarse-grained soils, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 36 (2013) 44-54. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 600 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 878 |
||
