پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 8 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 430 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,589 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,999,547 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,980,127 |
Analysis of Competition between Maritime and Multimodal Land-Sea Shipping in an International Freight Transportation Market | ||
| AUT Journal of Civil Engineering | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 6، شماره 1، خرداد 2022، صفحه 83-104 اصل مقاله (1.51 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22060/ajce.2022.20732.5775 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ehsan Salehi1؛ Amirhosein Allafeepour1؛ Mohammad Tamannaei* 1؛ Kayhan Tavassoli2 | ||
| 1Department of Transportation Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| 2Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Transportation, an integral element in international economic dynamics, plays a key role in both goods and service supply chains. This paperpresents a game theoretic approach to the competition between maritime and multimodal (land-sea) freight forwarding companies in an international freight transportation market. Two scenarios of railway systems are considered: flexible and inflexible systems, whose difference lies in their capability of an immediate reduction in delivery time through swift infrastructural and operational improvements. The competition is modeled for each system and the effects of different policies are assessed through parametric and numerical analyses, yielding insightful results. It is found that with the improvement of the railway infrastructure and schedule, the equilibrium prices rise and fall, respectively, for the multimodal and maritime freight forwarding agents. Also, the analysis of changes in waterway tolls and rail access charges shows that if the government's purpose boosting customer satisfaction by reducing waterway tolls or rail access charges, which results in reduced equilibrium delivery price and time, they prefer the inflexible scenario over the flexible one. Therefore, counterintuitively, the flexibility of railway systems poses a serious challenge to governments when endeavoring to favor customers. The findings of the research provide a firm ground whereon transportation managers, policy makers, and service providers can make decisions more confidently in competitive freight transportation markets. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| International freight market؛ Maritime transportation؛ Railway؛ Game theory؛ Policy making؛ Multimodal shipping | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] S. Chandra, M. Christiansen, K. Fagerholt, Analysing the modal shift from road-based to coastal shipping-based distribution–a case study of outbound automotive logistics in India, Maritime Policy & Management, 47(2) (2020) 273-286.
[2] K. Tavassoli, M.J.J.o.C.P. Tamannaei, Hub network design for integrated Bike-and-Ride services: A competitive approach to reducing automobile dependence, 248 (2020) 119247.
[3] S. Aminzadegan, M. Tamannaei, M.J.A.S.C. Fazeli, An integrated production and transportation scheduling problem with order acceptance and resource allocation decisions, 112 (2021) 107770.
[4] K. Zavitsas, T. Zis, M.G. Bell, The impact of flexible environmental policy on maritime supply chain resilience, Transport Policy, 72 (2018) 116-128.
[5] H. Hu, B. Du, M. Bernardo, Leasing or repositioning empty containers? Determining the time-varying guide leasing prices for decision making, Maritime Policy & Management, (2020) 1-17.
[6] C. Wan, X. Yan, D. Zhang, Z. Yang, Analysis of risk factors influencing the safety of maritime container supply chains, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 11(6) (2019) 476-507.
[7] T. Wang, M. Li, H. Hu, Berth allocation and quay crane-yard truck assignment considering carbon emissions in port area, International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 11(2-3) (2019) 216-242.
[8] T.P. Zis, H.N. Psaraftis, F. Tillig, J.W. Ringsberg, Decarbonizing maritime transport: A Ro-Pax case study, Research in Transportation Business & Management, 37 (2020) 100565.
[9] K. Shams, H. Asgari, X. Jin, Valuation of travel time reliability in freight transportation: A review and meta-analysis of stated preference studies, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 102 (2017) 228-243.
[10] J.-P. Rodrigue, T. Notteboom, Dry ports in European and North American intermodal rail systems: Two of a kind? Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5 (2012) 4-15.
[11] V. Reis, J.F. Meier, G. Pace, R. Palacin, Rail and multi-modal transport, Research in Transportation Economics, 41(1) (2013) 17-30.
[12] C. Tawfik, S. Limbourg, Pricing problems in intermodal freight transport: Research overview and prospects, Sustainability, 10(9) (2018) 3341.
[13] J.M. Pepe, Pepe, Valussi, Beyond Energy, Springer, 2018.
[14] C. Jiang, H. Li, G. Hua, Y. Ru, Multimodal Transportation Government Subsidies Strategy Based Stackelberg Game and DEA, in: ICTE 2015, 2015, pp. 274-279.
[15] M. SteadieSeifi, N.P. Dellaert, W. Nuijten, T. Van Woensel, R. Raoufi, Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review, European journal of operational research, 233(1) (2014) 1-15.
[16] M.B. Regmi, S. Hanaoka, Assessment of intermodal transport corridors: Cases from North-East and Central Asia, Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5 (2012) 27-37.
[17] M. Beuthe, B. Jourquin, J.-F. Geerts, C.K. à Ndjang'Ha, Freight transportation demand elasticities: a geographic multimodal transportation network analysis, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 37(4) (2001) 253-266.
[18] C.A. Vural, V. Roso, Á. Halldórsson, G. Ståhle, M. Yaruta, Can digitalization mitigate barriers to intermodal transport? An exploratory study, Research in Transportation Business & Management, 37 (2020) 100525.
[19] Y. Jiang, G. Qiao, J. Lu, Impacts of the new international land-sea trade corridor on the freight transport structure in China, central Asia, the ASEAN countries and the EU, Research in Transportation Business & Management, 35 (2020) 100419.
[20] M. Tamannaei, H. Zarei, M.J.T.R.P.B.M. Rasti-Barzoki, A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: Competition between road and intermodal road-rail systems with government intervention, 153 (2021) 272-295.
[21] B. Slack, Containerization, inter-port competition, and port selection, Maritime policy and management, 12(4) (1985) 293-303.
[22] H. Wang, Q. Meng, X. Zhang, Game-theoretical models for competition analysis in a new emerging liner container shipping market, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 70 (2014) 201-227.
[23] X. Jiang, H. Fan, M. Luo, Z. Xu, Strategic port competition in multimodal network development considering shippers’ choice, Transport Policy, (2020).
[24] M. Tamannaei, H. Zarei, S. Aminzadegan, A Game-Theoretic Approach to the Freight Transportation Pricing Problem in the Presence of Intermodal Service Providers in a Competitive Market, Networks and Spatial Economics, (2021).
[25] K. Mommens, T. van Lier, C. Macharis, Multimodal choice possibilities for different cargo types: Application to Belgium, Research in Transportation Business & Management, 37 (2020) 100528.
[26] A. Kanafani, Transportation demand analysis, (1983).
[27] E. Kim, G.J. Hewings, H. Amir, Economic evaluation of transportation projects: An application of Financial Computable General Equilibrium model, Research in Transportation Economics, 61 (2017) 44-55.
[28] G. Pace, S. Ricci, Multimodal, Intermodal and Terminals, in Sustainable Rail Transport, Springer, 2018, pp. 193-206.
[29] S. Karray, S.P. Sigué, A game-theoretic model for co-promotions: Choosing a complementary versus an independent product ally, Omega, 54 (2015) 84-100.
[30] B. Dan, G. Xu, C. Liu, Pricing policies in a dual-channel supply chain with retail services, International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1) (2012) 312-320.
[31] J. Wei, J. Zhao, Y. Li, Pricing decisions for complementary products with firms’ different market powers, European Journal of Operational Research, 224(3) (2013) 507-519.
[32] H. Jafari, S.R. Hejazi, M. Rasti-Barzoki, Pricing decisions in dual-channel supply chain including monopolistic manufacturer and duopolistic retailers: a game-theoretic approach, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 16(3) (2016) 323-343.
[33] X. Chen, X. Wang, Free or bundled: channel selection decisions under different power structures, Omega, 53 (2015) 11-20.
[34] E.J. Anderson, Y. Bao, Price competition with integrated and decentralized supply chains, European Journal of Operational research, 200(1) (2010) 227-234.
[35] K. Pan, K.K. Lai, S.C. Leung, D. Xiao, Revenue-sharing versus wholesale price mechanisms under different channel power structures, European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2) (2010) 532-538.
[36] J. Chaab, M. Rasti-Barzoki, Cooperative advertising and pricing in a manufacturer-retailer supply chain with a general demand function; A game-theoretic approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 99 (2016) 112-123.
[37] S.R. Madani, M. Rasti-Barzoki, Sustainable supply chain management with pricing, greening and governmental tariffs determining strategies: A game-theoretic approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105 (2017) 287-298.
[38] CAREC, A Railway Strategy for CAREC, 2017-2030, 2020.
[39] CAREC, Railway Sector Assessment for Peoples Republic of China, 2021.
[40] G. English, D.C. Hackston, Environmental and Social Impacts of Marine Transport in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Region, 2013. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 476 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 446 |
||