تعداد نشریات | 7 |
تعداد شمارهها | 399 |
تعداد مقالات | 5,389 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,287,995 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,882,744 |
بررسی آزمایشگاهی تأثیر سختی مسلح کننده و اندازهی ذرات خاک بر مقاومت بیرون کشیدگی مسلح کننده از خاک | ||
نشریه مهندسی عمران امیرکبیر | ||
دوره 55، شماره 5، مرداد 1402، صفحه 929-942 اصل مقاله (1.19 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22060/ceej.2023.21922.7853 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
احد اوریا* ؛ الیار حیدرلی؛ سعید کرم زادگان | ||
دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
یکی از مهمترین عوامل تاثیرگذار در رفتار مکانیکی سیستمهای خاک مسلح، پارامترهای اندرکنش بین خاک و مسلح کننده در فصل مشترک آنها می باشد. پارامترهای مکانیکی فصل مشترک خاک و مسلحکننده به مشخصات خاک و مسلحکننده وابسته است. در این تحقیق تأثیر اندازه دانههای خاک و نیز سختی مسلحکننده در مقاومت بیرونکشیدگی مسلحکننده از خاک بصورت آزمایشگاهی بررسی شده است. مقاومت بیرونکشیدگی سه نوع مسلح کننده با سختیهای متفاوت در سه نوع خاک با دانهبندیهای مختلف مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. آزمایشهای بیرونکشیدگی در سه سطح تنش 50، 100 و 150 کیلوپاسکال انجام شده است. برای بررسی این موضوع و تعیین شاخصی برای سختی مسلحکننده، دستگاهی ساخته شده است تا بتوان مقدار نفوذ دانههای جامد خاک در مسلح کننده اندازهگیری کرد. نتایج آزمایشها نشان میدهد فرورفتگی دانههای خاک در مسلحکننده تأثیر زیادی در مقاومت بیرونکشیدگی مسلحکننده از خاک داشته است. مقدار نفوذ دانههای جامد خاک در مسلحکننده با کاهش سختی مسلحکننده و افزایش اندازه قطر دانههای خاک افزایش مییابد. برای هر سطح تنش قائم مشخص، هر چقدر میزان نفوذ دانههای جامد خاک در مسلح کننده بیشتر بوده، مقاومت بیرون کشیدگی آن مسلح کننده نیز بیشتر بوده است. نتایج نشان میدهد با افزایش قطر دانههای جامد خاک، مقاومت بیرونکشیدگی مسلح کننده نیز افزایش یافته است ولی این افزایش در مورد مسلح کننده با سختی کمتر در مقایسه با مسلحکننده سختی بیشتر، چشمگیرتر بوده است و نیز اختلاف مقاومت بیرون کشیدگی سه مسلحکننده با سختی های مختلف در خاک ریزدانه کمتر از اختلاف مقاومت بیرونکشیدگی سه مسلح کننده در خاک درشت دانه بوده است که نشان دهنده تأثیر همزمان سختی مسلحکننده و اندازه دانههای خاک در مقاومت بیرونکشیدگی میباشد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
مقاومت بیرون کشش؛ سختی مسلح کننده؛ اندرکنش خاک و مسلح کننده؛ اندازهی دانههای خاک؛ خاک مسلح | ||
موضوعات | ||
تست های آزمایشگاهی؛ خاک مسلح؛ مکانیک خاک و پی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
A laboratory study of the influence of reinforcement stiffness and the size of soil particles on soil pull-out strength | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Ahad Ouria؛ Eliar Heidarli؛ Saeed Karamzadegan | ||
Civil Engineering Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The interaction parameters between soil and reinforcement at their interface play a critical role in influencing the mechanical behavior of reinforced soil systems. Interaction parameters between soil and reinforcement influence reinforced soil behavior mechanically. In this research, the effect of the size of soil grains and the stiffness of the reinforcement on the pull-out resistance of the reinforcement from the soil has been investigated in a laboratory. The pullout resistance of three types of reinforcements with different stiffness in three types of soil with different grain sizes has been investigated. Pull-out tests have been performed at three stress levels of 50, 100, and 150 kPa. To investigate this issue and determine an evaluation for the stiffness of the reinforcement, a device has been built to measure the penetration of solid soil grains in the reinforcement. The results of the tests show that the penetration of soil grains into the reinforcement has a significant impact on the resistance of the reinforcement to being pulled out of the soil. The amount of penetration of solid soil grains into reinforcement increases by reducing the stiffness of the reinforcement and increasing the size of the diameter of the soil grains. For each specific vertical stress level, the greater the penetration of solid soil grains into reinforcement, the higher the pull-out strength of that reinforcement. The results show that with the increase in the diameter of the solid grains of the soil, the pullout resistance of the reinforcement has also increased, but this increase has been more significant in the case of reinforcement with lower stiffness compared to reinforcement with higher stiffness. Also, the difference in the pullout resistance of three reinforcements with different stiffness in fine-grained soil was less than the difference in the pullout resistance of three reinforcements in coarse-grained soil, which indicates the simultaneous effect of reinforcement stiffness and soil grain size on pullout resistance. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Pull out strength, reinforcement stiffness, soil and reinforcement interaction, soil grain size, reinforced soil | ||
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
مراجع | ||
[1] M. Abu-Farsakh, J. Coronel, M. Tao, Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil–geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(7) (2007) 540-549. [2] M. Abdi, H. Mirzaeifar, Experimental and PIV evaluation of grain size and distribution on soil–geogrid interactions in pullout test, Soils and foundations, 57(6) (2017) 1045-1058.3 [3] J. Derksen, M. Ziegler, R. Fuentes, Geogrid-soil interaction: A new conceptual model and testing apparatus, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 49(5) (2021) 1393-1406. [4] H.-L. Wang, W.-H. Zhou, Z.-Y. Yin, X.-X. Jie, Effect of grain size distribution of sandy soil on shearing behaviors at soil–structure interface, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31(10) (2019) 04019238. [5] C. Suksiripattanapong, S. Horpibulsuk, A. Udomchai, A. Arulrajah, T. Tangsutthinon, Pullout resistance mechanism of bearing reinforcement embedded in coarse-grained soils: Laboratory and field investigations, Transportation Geotechnics, 22 (2020) 100297. [6] P. Punetha, P. Mohanty, M. Samanta, Microstructural investigation on mechanical behavior of soil-geosynthetic interface in direct shear test, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 45(3) (2017) 197-210. [7] A.M. Namjoo, K. Jafari, V. Toufigh, Effect of particle size of sand and surface properties of reinforcement on sand-geosynthetics and sand–carbon fiber polymer interface shear behavior, Transportation Geotechnics, 24 (2020) 100403. [8] A.M. Namjoo, M. Baniasadi, K. Jafari, S. Salam, M.M. Toufigh, V. Toufigh, Studying effects of interface surface roughness, mean particle size, and particle shape on the shear behavior of sand-coated CFRP interface, Transportation Geotechnics, 37 (2022) 100841. [9] A. Ouria, E. Heidarli, S. Karamzadegan, Utilization of recycled concrete aggregates as coarse material sandwich to improve the pullout strength of geosynthetics in a fine sand, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 8(5) (2022) 55. [10] K. Halder, D. Chakraborty, Effect of interface friction angle between soil and reinforcement on bearing capacity of strip footing placed on reinforced slope, International Journal of Geomechanics, 19(5) (2019) 06019008. [11] Z. Li, X. Yang, Required strength of geosynthetics in a reinforced slope with tensile strength cut-off subjected to seepage effects, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 47(4) (2019) 542-551. [12] A. Ouria, A. Mahmoudi, H. Sadeghpour, Effect of the geotextile arrangement on the bearing capacity of a strip footing, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 6(3) (2020) 1-14. [13] A. Ouria, S. Emami, S. Karamzadegan, Laboratory Investigation of the Effect of the Cement Treatment of the Interface and the Thicknesses of Reinforcement on its Pull-out Capacity, Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, 52(11) (2021) 2831-2846. [14] A. Ouria, S. Karamzadegan, S. Emami, Interface properties of a cement coated geocomposite, Construction and Building Materials, 266 (2021) 121014. [15] E. Heidarli, A. Ouria, Laboratory study of the effect of cement stabilization of the interface of reinforcement and sand on the interface shear strength, Civil Infrastructure Researches, (Articles in Press) (2022). [16] H. Sadeghpour, A. Fahmi, Laboratory Modeling of a Spread Footing on Sand Reinforced by Strips of Carbon Fiber Reinforcement, Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, (2022). [17] V. Toufigh, A. Ouria, C.S. Desai, N. Javid, V. Toufigh, H. Saadatmanesh, Interface behavior between carbon-fiber polymer and sand, Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 44(1) (2016) 385-390.19. [18] T. Yetimoglu, M. Inanir, O.E. Inanir, A study on bearing capacity of randomly distributed fiber-reinforced sand fills overlying soft clay, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 23(2) (2005) 174-183. [19] A. Ouria, E. Heidarly, Laboratory Investigation of the Effect of the Geotextile Placement Pattern on the Bearing Capacity of Footing on Reinforced Sand, Modares Civil Engineering journal, 21(3) (2021) 21-34. [20] A. Ouria, H. Sadeghpour, Laboratory and numerical simulation of the effect of wraparound anchorage of reinforcements on the bearing capacity of spread footing, Sharif Journal of Civil Engineering, 37(4.1) (2022) 93-104. [21] A. Ouria, E. Heidarli, M. Enshaei, A laboratory study of the effect of wraparound anchorage, increasing reinforcement thickness and nailing in improving the bearing capacity of strip foundation on sandy soil, Civil Infrastructure Researches, (Articles in Press) (2022). [22] A. Beyranvand, S.H. Lajevardi, M. Ghazavi, S.M. Mirhosseini, Laboratory investigation of pullout behavior of strengthened geogrid with concrete pieces in fine sand, Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 6(4) (2021) 1-11. [23] P. Vangla, G.M. Latha, Influence of particle size on the friction and interfacial shear strength of sands of similar morphology, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 1(1) (2015) 1-12. [24] Su, Li-Jun, Wan-Huan Zhou, Wei-Bin Chen, and Xixi Jie. "Effects of relative roughness and mean particle size on the shear strength of sand-steel interface." Measurement 122 (2018): 339-346. [25] F. Han, E. Ganju, R. Salgado, M. Prezzi, Effects of interface roughness, particle geometry, and gradation on the sand–steel interface friction angle, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 144(12) (2018) 04018096. [26]A.K. Choudhary, A.M. Krishna, Experimental investigation of interface behaviour of different types of granular soil/geosynthetics, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2(1) (2016) 1-11. [27] D. Esmaili, K. Hatami, G.A. Miller, Influence of matric suction on geotextile reinforcement-marginal soil interface strength, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 42(2) (2014) 139-153. [28] S. Vibha, P. Divya, Performance of geosynthetic reinforced MSE walls with marginal backfills at the onset of rainfall infiltration, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 7(1) (2021) 1-16. [29] S. Attache, M. Mellas, Numerical study of large-scale pull-out test of horizontal corrugated strips, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, (2017). [30] D. Astm, 2487, standard classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 4 (2011) 206-215. [31] A. Standard, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Geotextiles by the Wide-Width Strip Method, (2011). [32] A. Standard, Standard Test Method for Measuring the Nominal Thickness of Geosynthetics, (2012). [33] A. Standard, Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass per Unit Area of Geotextiles, (2010). [34] A. Standard, Standard Test Method for Measuring Geosynthetic Pullout Resistance in Soil, (2013). [35] R. Jewell, Reinforcement bond capacity, Geotechnique, 40(3) (1990) 513-518. [36]J. Esfandiari, M. Selamat, Laboratory investigation on the effect of transverse member on pull out capacity of metal strip reinforcement in sand, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 35 (2012) 41-49. [37] D. Cazzuffi, L. Picarelli, A. Ricciuti, P. Rimoldi, Laboratory investigations on the shear strength of geogrid reinforced soils, in: Geosynthetic soil reinforcement testing procedures, ASTM International, 1993. [38] F. Ferreira, C.S. Vieira, M. Lopes, Direct shear behaviour of residual soil–geosynthetic interfaces–influence of soil moisture content, soil density and geosynthetic type, Geosynthetics International, 22(3) (2015) 257-272. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 275 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 501 |