Automated Negotiation Agents in Modeling Gaussian Bidders

[1] F. Zafari, F. Nassiri-Mofakham, Popponent: Highly accurate, individually and socially efficient opponent preference model in bilateral multi issue negotiations, Artificial Intelligence, 237 (2016) 59-91.

[2] F. Nassiri-Mofakham, M.N. Huhns, Role of culture in water resources management via sustainable social automated negotiation, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 86 (2023) 101465.

[3] M. Alrifai, F. Nassiri-Mofakham, Bilateral Multi-Issue E-Negotiation Model Based on Abductive Logic in E-Commerce Using DALI, in:  Encyclopedia of E-Commerce Development, Implementation, and Management, IGI Global, 2016, pp. 675-714.

[4] M. Montazeri, H. Kebriaei, B.N. Araabi, Learning pareto optimal solution of a multi-attribute bilateral negotiation using deep reinforcement, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 43 (2020) 100987.

[5] Z. Khosravimehr, F. Nassiri-Mofakham, Pars agent: hybrid time-dependent, random and frequency-based bidding and acceptance strategies in multilateral negotiations, in:  Modern Approaches to Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation, Springer, 2017, pp. 175-183.

[6] Z. Khosravimehr, F. Nassiri-Mofakham, Effective Acceptance Strategy Using Cluster-Based Opponent Modeling in Multilateral Negotiation, in:  International Workshop on Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiation, Springer, 2018, pp. 83-98.

[7] F. Zafari, F. Nassiri-Mofakham, Bravecat: iterative deepening distance-based opponent modeling and hybrid bidding in nonlinear ultra large bilateral multi issue negotiation domains, in:  Recent Advances in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation, Springer, 2016, pp. 285-293.

[8] G. Weiss, Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence, MIT press, 1999.

[9] M. Wooldrigdge, A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence, Capítulo I-Agentes Inteligentes, editado por G. Weiss,  (1999).

[10] N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, A.R. Lomuscio, S. Parsons, C. Sierra, M. Wooldridge, Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges, International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2) (2001) 199-215.

[11] M. Fasli, Agent technology for e-commerce, Wiley, 2007.

[12] R. Booth, Y. Chevaleyre, J. Lang, J. Mengin, C. Sombattheera, Learning conditionally lexicographic preference relations, in:  ECAI, 2010, pp. 269-274.

[13] M. Ghotbi, F. Nassiri-Mofakham, Aggregating WCP-Nets using Borda Choice.

[14] Automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC), in, http://ii.tudelft.nl/negotiation/node/7.

[15] A. Dirkzwager, Towards Understanding Negotiation Strategies: Analyzing the Dynamics of Strategy Components,M. Sc. Thesis, Faculty EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, in, 2013.

[16] S. Mirzayi, F. Taghiyareh, F. Nassiri-Mofakham, The effect of online opponent modeling on utilities of agents in bilateral negotiation, in:  2017 Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing Conference (AISP), IEEE, 2017, pp. 341-346.

[17] S. Mirzayi, F. Taghiyareh, F. Nassiri-Mofakham, An opponent-adaptive strategy to increase utility and fairness in agents’ negotiation, Applied Intelligence, 52(4) (2022) 3587-3603.

[18] F. Zafari, M.F. NASSIRI, H.A. ZEINAL, Dopponent: A socially efficient preference model of opponent in bilateral multi issue negotiations,  (2014).

[19] H. Peters, S. Roy, S. Sadhukhan, Unanimous and strategy-proof probabilistic rules for single-peaked preference profiles on graphs, Mathematics of Operations Research, 46(2) (2021) 811-833.

[20] C. Puppe, The single-peaked domain revisited: A simple global characterization, Journal of Economic Theory, 176 (2018) 55-80.

[21] A. Beynier, N. Maudet, S. Rey, P. Shams, Swap dynamics in single-peaked housing markets, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 35(2) (2021) 1-37.

[22] R.C. van het Schip, S. van Splunter, F.M. Brazier, Template evaluation and selection for ws-agreement, in:  Service Level Agreements in Grids Workshop, 2009.

[23] T. Ito, M. Klein, A multi-issue negotiation protocol among competitive agents and its extension to a nonlinear utility negotiation protocol, in:  Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 2006, pp. 435-437.

[24] ANAC Agents' Repository, in, https://tracinsy.ewi.tudelft.nl/pubtrac/Genius/browser/src/main/java/agents?order=name.

[25] F. Hassanvand, F. Nassiri-Mofakham, Experimental analysis of automated negotiation agents in modeling Gaussian bidders, in:  2021 12th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Technology (IKT), IEEE, 2021, pp. 197-201.

[26] M. Klein, H. Sayama, P. Faratin, Y. Bar-Yam, The dynamics of collaborative design: insights from complex systems and negotiation research, Concurrent Engineering, 11(3) (2003) 201-209.

[27] V. Conitzer, Eliciting single-peaked preferences using comparison queries, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 35 (2009) 161-191.

[28] K.J. Arrow, Social choice and individual values, Yale university press, 2012.

[29] A. Gibbard, Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result, Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society,  (1973) 587-601.

[30] D. Black, On the rationale of group decision-making, Journal of political economy, 56(1) (1948) 23-34.

[31] M.J. Hinich, M.C. Munger, Analytical politics, Cambridge University Press, 1997.

[32] D. Black, The theory of committees and elections,  (1958).

[33] R. Juarez, J.S. You, Optimality of the uniform rule under single-peaked preferences, Economic Theory Bulletin, 7(1) (2019) 27-36.

[34] A. Beynier, N. Maudet, S. Rey, P. Shams, House markets and single-peaked preferences: From centralized to decentralized allocation procedures, arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.10250,  (2019).

[35] S. Bade, Matching with single-peaked preferences, Journal of Economic Theory, 180 (2019) 81-99.

[36] C. Wang, X. Wu, Cake cutting with single-peaked valuations, in:  International Conference on Combinatorial Optimization and Applications, Springer, 2019, pp. 507-516.

[37] B. Bhardwaj, R. Kumar, J. Ortega, Fairness and efficiency in cake-cutting with single-peaked preferences, Economics Letters, 190 (2020) 109064.

[38] Z. Fitzsimmons, M. Lackner, Incomplete preferences in single-peaked electorates, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 67 (2020) 797-833.

[39] B. Escoffier, O. Spanjaard, M. Tydrichová, Recognizing single-peaked preferences on an arbitrary graph: Complexity and algorithms, in:  International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory, Springer, 2020, pp. 291-306.

[40] A.G. Bonifacio, Bribe-proof reallocation with single-peaked preferences, Social Choice and Welfare, 44(3) (2015) 617-638.

[41] C. Jonker, R. Aydogan, T. Baarslag, K. Fujita, T. Ito, K. Hindriks, Automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC), in:  Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017.

[42] A. Rubinstein, Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,  (1982) 97-109.

[43] K. Hindriks, D. Tykhonov, Opponent modelling in automated multi-issue negotiation using bayesian learning, in:  Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems-Volume 1, 2008, pp. 331-338.

[44] F. Nassiri-Mofakham, N. Ghasem-Aghaee, M. Ali Nematbakhsh, A. Baraani-Dastjerdi, A personality-based simulation of bargaining in e-commerce, Simulation & gaming, 39(1) (2008) 83-100.

[45] F. Nassiri-Mofakham, M.A. Nematbakhsh, N. Ghasem-Aghaee, A. Baraani-Dastjerdi, A heuristic personality-based bilateral multi-issue bargaining model in electronic commerce, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(1) (2009) 1-35.

[46] P. Faratin, C. Sierra, N.R. Jennings, Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 24(3-4) (1998) 159-182.

[47] A. Ebrahimnezad, H. Jazayeriy, F. Nassiri-Mofakham, Statistical Distance-Based Acceptance Strategy for Desirable Offers in Bilateral Automated Negotiation, in:  2020 11th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Technology (IKT), IEEE, 2020, pp. 31-34.

[48] R. Lin, S. Kraus, T. Baarslag, D. Tykhonov, K. Hindriks, C.M. Jonker, Genius: An integrated environment for supporting the design of generic automated negotiators, Computational Intelligence, 30(1) (2014) 48-70.

[49] C.R. Williams, V. Robu, E.H. Gerding, N.R. Jennings, Iamhaggler: A negotiation agent for complex environments, in:  New Trends in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiations, Springer, 2012, pp. 151-158.

[50] T. Van Krimpen, D. Looije, S. Hajizadeh, Hardheaded, in:  Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions, Springer, 2013, pp. 223-227.

[51] J. Hao, H.-f. Leung, CUHKAgent: an adaptive negotiation strategy for bilateral negotiations over multiple items, in:  Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation, Springer, 2014, pp. 171-179.

[52] A. Dirkzwager, M. Hendrikx, J. De Ruiter, Thenegotiator: A dynamic strategy for bilateral negotiations with time-based discounts, in:  Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions, Springer, 2013, pp. 217-221.

[53] S. Kakimoto, K. Fujita, Randomdance: compromising strategy considering interdependencies of issues with randomness, in:  Modern Approaches to Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation, Springer, 2017, pp. 185-189.

[54] B. Sosale, S. Satish, B. An, Agent Buyog: a negotiation strategy for tri-party multi issue negotiation, in:  Modern Approaches to Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation, Springer, 2017, pp. 191-199.

[55] L.D. Şerban, G.C. Silaghi, C.M. Litan, AgentFSEGA: time constrained reasoning model for bilateral multi-issue negotiations, in:  New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations, Springer, 2012, pp. 159-165.

[56] C.R. Williams, V. Robu, E.H. Gerding, N.R. Jennings, An overview of the results and insights from the third automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC2012), Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation,  (2014) 151-162.

[57] T. Baarslag, K. Hindriks, C. Jonker, S. Kraus, R. Lin, The first automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC 2010), in:  New Trends in agent-based complex automated negotiations, Springer, 2012, pp. 113-135.

[58] R. Aydogan, T. Baarslag, K. Fujita, K. Hindriks, T. Ito, C. Jonker, The seventh international automated negotiating agents competition (anac2016), in, 2016.

[59] T. Klos, K. Somefun, H. La Poutré, Automated interactive sales processes, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(4) (2010) 54-61.