پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 8 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 430 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,589 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,990,048 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,966,996 |
مدل‌سازی عددی برش سنگ با جت آب ساینده به منظور تعیین محدوده بهینه پارامترهای مؤثر بر عمق و حجم برش | ||
| نشریه مهندسی مکانیک امیرکبیر | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 55، شماره 8، آبان 1402، صفحه 971-994 اصل مقاله (2.69 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22060/mej.2023.22439.7619 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ستار مهدوری* 1؛ پدرام بختیاری هفت‌لنگ2؛ حبیب سایه وند2 | ||
| 1دانشکده مهندسی معدن، دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر (پلی‌تکنیک تهران)، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این تحقیق به منظور افزایش راندمان و بهبود کیفیت برش سنگ‌ها توسط جت آب ساینده، محدوده بهینه پارامترهای مؤثر بر برش از طریق مدل‌سازی جریان پر سرعت دوفازی (آب و ساینده) بررسی شده است. فرآیند برش سنگ توسط جت آب ذره‌ای به روش اجزاء محدود- هیدرودینامیک ذرات روان شبیه‌سازی شده است. برای این منظور اثر پارامترهای سرعت، زمان توقف، تغییر غلظت حجمی و تغییر قطر ذرات ساینده بر روی عمق و حجم برش سنگ‌های سیلت‌استون و شیل بررسی شده است. نتایج مدل‌سازی عددی نشان می‌دهد که با افزایش سرعت، مقدار عمق و حجم برش سنگ افزایش می‌یابد. همچنین با افزایش زمان توقف، انرژی مصرفی جت آب برای برش سنگ بیشتر می‌شود که منجر به افزایش عمق و حجم برش خواهد شد. با افزایش غلظت حجمی ذرات ساینده تا 3 درصد، عمق و حجم برش با شیب ملایم افزایش یافته و بعد از آن بهبود چشم‌گیری در افزایش عمق و حجم برش مشاهده نمی‌شود. با افزایش قطر ذرات ساینده تا1/25 میلی‌متر برای سیلت‌استون و 1 میلی‌متر برای شیل عمق و حجم برش زیاد شده و بعد از آن عمق و حجم برش ثابت مانده و یا کاهش می‌یابد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| جت آب ساینده؛ برش سنگ؛ روش اجزاء محدود؛ روش هیدرودینامیک ذرات روان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Numerical modeling of rock cutting with abrasive waterjet to determine the optimal parameters affecting cutting depth and volume | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Satar Mahdevari1؛ Pedram Bakhtiari HaftLang2؛ Habib Sayehvand2 | ||
| 1Department of Mining Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In this research, the optimal parameters have been investigated with the aim of increasing the efficiency and improving the quality of rock cutting using an Abrasive Water Jet (AWJ) through the modeling of high-velocity two-phase flow (water and abrasive). The rock-cutting process by AWJ has been simulated using the combined finite element method-smoothed particle hydrodynamics in LS-DYNA software. For this purpose, the effect of parameters of jet velocity, dwell time, changes in volumetric concentration, and changes in the diameter of abrasive particles on the cutting depth and cutting volume of siltstone and shale rock specimens have been investigated. Numerical modeling results showed that with increasing velocity, the cutting depth and cutting volume increased. As the dwell time increases, the energy used by the AWJ to cut the rock increases, which would lead to an increase in the depth and volume of the cut. By increasing the volumetric concentration of abrasive particles up to 3%, the depth and volume of the cut increased with a gentle slope, and after that, no significant improvement was observed. Also, by increasing the diameter of the abrasive particles up to 1.25 mm for siltstone and 1 mm for shale, the depth and volume of the cut increased at first, and after that, they remained constant or decreased. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Abrasive waterjet, rock cutting, Finite Element Method (FEM), Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] N. Asadi, and A. Shafiei, Simulation of water jet cutting for granite by using smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Journal of Analytical and Numerical Methods in Mining Engineering, 10(23), (2020) 53-63. (in Persian). [2] C. A. Fourness, C. M. Pearson, Paper metering cutting and reeling, US Patent 2,006,499, (1933). [3] B.G. Schwacha, Liquid cutting of hard materials, US Patent 2,985,050, (1958) 1-4. [4] D. R. Jenkins, T. Landis, Valkyrie: north american's mach 3 superbomber, Specialty Press, (2004). [5] N.C. Franz, High velocity liquid jet, US Patent 3,524,367, (1968). [6] X. Liu, Z. Liang, G. Wen, X. Yuan, Waterjet machining and research developments: a review, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 102(5-8) (2019) 1257-1335. [7] G. Aydin, S. Kaya, I. Karakurt, Effect of abrasive type on marble cutting performance of abrasive waterjet, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12(11) (2019). [8] Y. Natarajan, P.K. Murugesan, M. Mohan, S.A. Liyakath Ali Khan, Abrasive Water Jet Machining process: A state of art of review, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 49 (2020) 271-322. [9] J. Zhao, G. Zhang, Y. Xu, R. Wang, W. Zhou, L. Han, Y. Zhou, Mechanism and effect of jet parameters on particle waterjet rock breaking, Powder Technology, 313 (2017) 231-244. [10] J.A.R. Sumit Bhowmik, Abrasive water jet machining of composite materials, Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, (2017) 77-97. [11] M. Hashish, A Modeling Study of Metal Cutting With Abrasive Waterjets, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 106(1) (1984) 88-100. [12] M. Hashish, A Model for Abrasive-Waterjet (AWJ) Machining, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 111(2) (1989) 154-162. [13] M. Ramulu, Dynamic photoelastic investigation on the mechanics of waterjet and abrasive waterjet machining, Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 19(1-3) (1993) 43-65. [14] M. Hashish, D.E. Steele, D.H. Bothell, Machining with super-pressure (690 MPa) waterjets, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 37(4) (1997) 465-479. [15] A.W. Momber, R. Kovacevic, Test parameter analysis in abrasive water jet cutting of rocklike materials, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 34(1) (1997) 17-25. [16] A.W. Momber, The kinetic energy of wear particles generated by abrasive–water-jet erosion, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 83(1-3) (1998) 121-126. [17] M.K. Kulekci, Processes and apparatus developments in industrial waterjet applications, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(12) (2002) 1297-1306. [18] K. Maniadaki, T. Kestis, N. Bilalis, A. Antoniadis, A finite element-based model for pure waterjet process simulation, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 31(9-10) (2006) 933-940. [19] H. Shahverdi, M. Zohoor, S. M. Mousavi, Numerical simulation of abrasive water jet cutting process using the SPH and ALE methods, Int. J. Adv. Des. Manuf. Technol., 117 (2011) 43-50. [20] G. Wenjun, W. Jianming, G. Na, Numerical simulation for abrasive water jet machining based on ALE algorithm, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 53(1-4) (2010) 247-253. [21] M. Gent, M. Menéndez, S. Torno, J. Toraño, A. Schenk, Experimental evaluation of the physical properties required of abrasives for optimizing waterjet cutting of ductile materials, Wear, 284-285 (2012) 43-51. [22] C.-Y. Hsu, C.-C. Liang, T.-L. Teng, A.-T. Nguyen, A numerical study on high-speed water jet impact, Ocean Engineering, 72 (2013) 98-106. [23] S.D. Lianhuan Guo, Xin Yang, Numerical simulation of abrasive water jet cutting chemical pipeline based on SPH coupled FEM, The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering 51 (2015) 73-78. [24] F. Wang, R. Wang, W. Zhou, G. Chen, Numerical simulation and experimental verification of the rock damage field under particle water jet impacting, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 102 (2017) 169-179. [25] X. Chen, J. Guan, S. Deng, Q. Liu, M. Chen, Features and mechanism of abrasive water jet cutting of Q345 steel, International Journal of Heat and Technology, 36(1) (2018) 81-87. [26] M.M. Gregory Pasken, J. Ma, and Muhammad P. Jahan Numerical modeling of a pure water jet machining of Ti-6Al-4V and Al 6061-T6 using abaqus and smoothed particle hydrodynamics, ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo. Proc, 2 (2018) 1–6. [27] L. Feng, G.R. Liu, Z. Li, X. Dong, M. Du, Study on the effects of abrasive particle shape on the cutting performance of Ti-6Al-4V materials based on the SPH method, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 101(9-12) (2018) 3167-3182. [28] S. Liu, Y. Cui, Y. Chen, C. Guo, Numerical research on rock breaking by abrasive water jet-pick under confining pressure, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 120 (2019) 41-49. [29] H.K. I. Ben Belgacem, L. Cheikh, E. M. Barhoumi, and W. Ben Salem, Comparison Between Two Numerical Methods SPH/FEM and CEL by Numerical Simulation of an Impacting Water Jet, Lect. Notes Mech. Eng., (2020) 50–60. [30] D. Liu, C. Huang, J. Wang, H. Zhu, Material removal mechanisms of ceramics turned by abrasive waterjet (AWJ) using a novel approach, Ceramics International, 47(11) (2021) 15165-15172. [31] R. Yu, X. Dong, Z. Li, M. Du, Q. Zhang, SPH-FEM simulation of concrete breaking process due to impact of high-speed water jet, AIP Advances, 11(4) (2021). [32] A.R. Hossein Mehmannavaz, Gholamhossain Liaghat, Hamid fazeli, Mohsen Rouhbakhsh, Numerical analysis of shaped charge jet penetration into discrete concrete targets using Ls-dyna and Ansys-Autodyn, Amirkabir J. Mech. Eng, (53(Special Issue 6)) (2021) 939-942. (in Persian) [33] B. Vasudevan, Y. Natarajan, R. Pavan Kumar, K. Umesh Chandra, D. Sikder, Simulation of AWJ drilling process using the FEA coupled SPH models: A preliminary study, Materials Today: Proceedings, 62 (2022) 6022-6028. [34] Z. Wang, X. Lei, W. Zhou, Y. Wang, J. Cao, L. Li, G. Chen, C. Wang, Numerical simulation of the damage process of rock containing cracks by impacts of steel-particle water jet, Powder Technology, 422 (2023). [35] H. Zhao, H. Jiang, S. Warisawa, H. Li, Numerical study of abrasive water jet rotational slits in hard rock using a coupled SPH-FEM method, Powder Technology, 426 (2023). [36] S. Budaraju, Numerical modelling of the abrasive waterjet (AWJ) cutting process using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method, University of British Columbia Library, (2019). [37] L. Vinet, A. Zhedanov, A ‘missing’ family of classical orthogonal polynomials, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(8) (2011). [38] S.S. Rao, The finite element method in engineering, Elsevier, (2011). [39] C.A. Dutra Fraga Filho, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: fundamentals and basic applications in continuum Mechanics, Springer, (2019). [40] R. Vignjevic, Review of development of the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method, Crashworthiness, Impact and Structural Mechanics (CISM), (2009). [41] T. De Vuyst, R. Vignjevic, J.C. Campbell, Coupling between meshless and finite element methods, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 31(8) (2005) 1054-1064. [42] L.E. Schwer, Y.D. Murray, A three‐invariant smooth cap model with mixed hardening, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 18(10) (2005) 657-688. [43] L.E. Schwer, Viscoplastic augmentation of the smooth cap model, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 150(2-3) (1994) 215-223. [44] Y.D. Murray, B.A. Lewis, Numerical simulation of damage in concrete. Technical Report Submitted to the Defense Nuclear Agency by APTEK, (1995). [45] L.E. Schwer, Demonstration of the continuous surface cap model with damage: concrete unconfined compression test calibration, Ls-dyna Geomaterial Modeling Short Course Notes, (2001). [46] L.E. Schwer, Y.D. Murray, Continuous surface cap model for geomaterial modeling: A new ls-dyna material type, in: Proceedings of Seventh international Ls-dyna User Conference, (2002). [47] H. Jiang, J. Zhao, Calibration of the continuous surface cap model for concrete, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 97 (2015) 1-19. [48] Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), Material models in Ls-dyna, Ls-dyna Keyword User’s Manual Vol II, (2012). [49] Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), Contact modeling in Ls-dyna, Ls-dyna Keyword User’s Manual Vol I, (2012). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 520 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 628 |
||